Looks like someone was a tad ambitious at the size of the American venues - from another forum:
If American fans haven't bought your tickets yet, AXS is selling half price tickets on the app.
Because some idiot thought Pulp would fill 8000-10,000 seat venues in America in 2025. Probably the same schmuck who thought Roxy Music would fill arenas.
I don't think that the UK arena tour sold out. When I saw them at London o2, it wasn't full. I'd say a reasonable estimate would be that it was around 95% full. Perhaps it's because the band have now been touring again for over 2 years and anyone who wanted to see them has had their chance. If there really are going to be tour dates in 2026 then perhaps smaller venues would be more appropriate, nothing wrong with that.
They played 2 dates in Toronto a year ago in a 2500 theatre and are playing a 16000 stadium next month. Someone should have given that more thought. Loads of tickets left.
If there are more UK dates next year, I wonder would they go to arenas/sheds in cities they haven't been to since 1998 (ie Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Hull) and places that are a bit out of the way and starved of big concerts - Exeter, Norwich, even Newcastle.
From what Mark has said, it seems Jarvis still wants to play as big a venue as they can.
Agreed about the O2 Ian and I thought it had just the right amount of people there, to get to and from the bar without any hassle and still get a decent view of the stage. I'm in two minds about having a massive venue that's not filled with enough people to detract from the vibe. O2 was a good atmosphere because people were clearly there to watch Pulp and thankfully not too many people looking at their phones instead of the band, or at least not where I was. The lighting was good too, so that the main focal point was the stage. It was the same for when I saw Pulp in Amsterdam, albeit with a slightly smaller venue than the O2 (or it seemed the case). It helped that Pulp had loads of energy for both and the gigs were fantastic. In comparison when I saw the Manics in the Brighton Centre a few years ago, the lighting was too bright and really showed how empty the standing area was and reflecting on that now, I think to an embarrassing level. There weren't too many people singing along to their then new songs either, which really put a dampener on the gig. I went to the Birmingham NEC earlier for another this year too and although the standing area wasn't packed, the lighting made all the difference to the atmosphere. Not knowing any of the US venues, I'm sure Pulp will smash it anyway - of course they will. For 2026, I'd be happy with a few other locations across the UK - but frankly, I'd see them again anywhere as long as they continue with the same energy!
If there are more UK dates next year, I wonder would they go to arenas/sheds in cities they haven't been to since 1998 (ie Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Hull) and places that are a bit out of the way and starved of big concerts - Exeter, Norwich, even Newcastle.
From what Mark has said, it seems Jarvis still wants to play as big a venue as they can.
Perhaps I am posting this on the wrong thread but I have just remembered that I had a dream the other night about Pulp playing an outdoor show in Liverpool. I don't think I have ever been to an outdoor concert in Liverpool but I think it would work quite well.
Standing in a park with nearly 50,000 people behind me at Tramlines earlier this year was actually a bit of a nightmare tbh. Especially when it came to leaving and you're funnelled into an exit you don't want to use. We ended up having a very tiring walk home and didn't get back until midnight.
Jarvis did mention how Pulp had never played an outdoor gig in Sheffield before with a "hmm now there's an idea" tone in his voice so who knows, maybe a big outdoor gig might be on the cards.
Oh, wow, that's a big capacity venue in Toronto. I was just wondering about that, I'd presumed ticket sales were going well, if they were only half full would you be losing a lot of money? It always strikes me that there's a lot of money pumped back in at the Pulp gigs. They've got so many extra personnel and a great stage show.
I suppose they were in the US and Canada last year. Having said that, I'd go every year if they were here every year!
I would assume that there is a break-even point which varies with the venue/location.
The band would never share this info with us (quite rightly) but it would be interesting to know how much they make from live performances and if there any where they have made a significant profit/loss over the years.
They certainly don't do it in a lean way. Mark has said the 2020s-Pulp concerts are very expensive to put on and there are territories like France where they haven't had offers from promoters to make it work.
Yeah, I can see how the tickets were the price they were given the numbers of people on stage and all of the props and screens. Were the tickets pricier in the US and Canada maybe with having to ship a lot of gear etc. Isn't travel to the US down in general this year? Perhaps that's a bit of it.
-- Edited by Jean on Tuesday 26th of August 2025 09:44:58 PM
As much as I'd love to see Pulp play more venues like Co-op, I'd love them to play a strip down show at something like the Jacaranda Liverpool - such a great intimate venue.
Honestly, when I saw they are playing in Budweiser Stage, 16000 capacity, in Toronto. I was wondering why and doubting they can fill the stadium. I love Pulp from the bottom of my heart and they are the only one. But they are not that popular in Canada. When Spike Island came out, Acrylic Afternoon made a chart about air plays. Canada only got 4 plays Also, they came here last year, History, 2500 capacity, so 2 nights, we assume 5000. 5000 vs 16000.
I really want to go, but I have family issue this year so I cant! I met a couple who are from Montreal last year, I dont know if they can make it this time. I am so sad and worry about the North America tour.
On the other hand, if the tickets sales is not as good as expected, when will they com here again? I dont think they will, next year, at least. And will they keep making new album and music? They are not those singers/bands who make music just for money.
If there are more UK dates next year, I wonder would they go to arenas/sheds in cities they haven't been to since 1998 (ie Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Hull) and places that are a bit out of the way and starved of big concerts - Exeter, Norwich, even Newcastle.
From what Mark has said, it seems Jarvis still wants to play as big a venue as they can.
It's disappointing that Jarvis only wants "BIG" gigs. I'd love to see them play some smaller venues.
Would love a more thorough UK tour - I mean they've already played some fairly unconventional places (although, them doing both Bridlington and Scarborough is VERY Pulp) - would love to see them continue that trend. Pulp Aberdeen! Pulp York! Pulp Bristol! They went to Hereford in 1998!
Last year they left the string section at home (Emma was the string section!), as well as most of the multimedia. I expect they'll do something similar this year, especially in light of the weak sales.
And while they did sell 5,000 tickets in Toronto, I suspect they sold them to around 3,500 people, many of whom attended both shows (that's a wild guess based on no actual information).
If it's practical to change venues, it could happen. It probably isn't, so deep discounts on tickets are almost certain. They'll want as many people as possible inside buying merch and creating a fun atmosphere. A 2/3 empty venue is not fun. And I'm sure venues and promoters want a full house buying the $20 beers.
-- Edited by Pulp Friction on Wednesday 27th of August 2025 10:12:50 PM
It's disappointing that Jarvis only wants "BIG" gigs. I'd love to see them play some smaller venues.
I kind of agree, although I can see what his reasoning might be: touring mid-size venues and more unusual places is what he was doing as Jarv Is, so he could just go back to that if he wanted to work on that sort of scale. To me, part of the difference between solo Jarv and Pulp is about being more outward-facing and universal, which goes hand in hand with a bigger audience. Part of the attraction for him (and the others?) must be that buzz of playing a large-scale, ambitious show to a huge, adoring crowd.
But yes - how cool would a Pulp deep cuts show in Peak Cavern be!
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
Last year they left the string section at home (Emma was the string section!), as well as most of the multimedia. I expect they'll do something similar this year, especially in light of the weak sales.
And while they did sell 5,000 tickets in Toronto, I suspect they sold them to around 3,500 people, many of whom attended both shows (that's a wild guess based on no actual information).
If it's practical to change venues, it could happen. It probably isn't, so deep discounts on tickets are almost certain. They'll want as many people as possible inside buying merch and creating a fun atmosphere. A 2/3 empty venue is not fun. And I'm sure venues and promoters want a full house buying the $20 beers.
-- Edited by Pulp Friction on Wednesday 27th of August 2025 10:12:50 PM
Your wild guess has some merit. 5 of us attended both nights and I did see others both nights. Know the next Toronto show will be empty is heart breaking.
If there are more UK dates next year, I wonder would they go to arenas/sheds in cities they haven't been to since 1998 (ie Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Hull) and places that are a bit out of the way and starved of big concerts - Exeter, Norwich, even Newcastle.
From what Mark has said, it seems Jarvis still wants to play as big a venue as they can.
It's disappointing that Jarvis only wants "BIG" gigs. I'd love to see them play some smaller venues.
Would love a more thorough UK tour - I mean they've already played some fairly unconventional places (although, them doing both Bridlington and Scarborough is VERY Pulp) - would love to see them continue that trend. Pulp Aberdeen! Pulp York! Pulp Bristol! They went to Hereford in 1998!
I suppose Jarvis wants to make as much money as possible, it's probably the last "big" tour they will do. In a few years, demand won't be that huge, i'm sure venue will be much smaller if there is another new album.
Guessing another consideration is an understandable preference for playing one larger show rather than two small ones back-to-back. Unfortunately this, combined with last year's strong sales, seems to have led the band, management and/or promoters to book overly large venues.
And yes, it was wonderful to see them in small venues last year. Stripped down production, but still fantastic.
How does it work? Because you hear about such and such 'offered us a considerable amount of money'. Is it that on the back of a successful tour like, say, Encore then another promoter comes along and makes a big offer and then you've to recoup that and more?
It's a real pity if the tickets aren't selling. Fingers crossed for them. They put on such a brilliant show. Pity it's not a bit closer for the bulk of their fan base and we could all just go! If they did multiple nights here I'd be there every night!
I haven't bought much in the way of merchandise this time as the one thing I ordered went missing and I didn't select tracked postage so I'm not taking the risk again. Pity as I'd ordered a few items last time around and no problems at all.
In general I love the small venues but I've loved seeing Pulp at bigger venues with that big production. A real spectacle. I've actually never seen them in a small venue. Saw Jarvis solo first album at a small tent at a festival. Was great to see him and Steve up so close.
I think last year the tour was successful and this makes them want to challenge bigger venues this year. But, maybe a medium sized venues are better?! They are on their way to North America soon, it is what it is.
Pulps live is better than studio. No matter the sale is good or not-so-good, I bet everyone includes the band will have fun and great time.
I wonder will Pulp turn-up on one of the US late-night TV talkshows to promote the album and more importantly, the tour in the hope of shifting more tickets.
Oh and no Sunrise! Does that end its unbroken record of being performed at every Pulp gig since its debut?
@Lipglossed, you're the stats person for live Pulp, what say you?
Yeah, Ian's got it. Glastonbury was the first time it hadn't been played since 1999!
Wowzers, lucky yanks, getting Lipgloss and My Sex... two of my big wants for the UK shows! Still I can't complain - I already got Lipgloss at Hogmanay, and this summer I've got Sex City, Miner's Strike, Party Hard, Lyndhurst Grove, and Seconds.
I hope there's more UK shows this year though. They seem to be getting kicks out of the back-catalogue and realising that there's so many songs there that still stand up so well even when the crowd is unfamiliar with them.
OU, Lippy and Aged in the one go are the holy trinity for me - key singles from their respective eras but criminally under-represented by that bad man C0cker's usual choices.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Friday 5th of September 2025 05:30:10 PM
Joyriders in for Lipgloss and Sunrise restored in Washington DC last night.
The lyrics for My Sex seem to be causing trouble for Jarv - the volume, not the content. Apparently there was a false start. There's a vid on YouTube of the performance of it in Atlanta and he repeats some of the words. No harm, still sounded great!
Nick and Candida wore tshirts at the show in DC supporting the city in the face of Trump's use of the army to "restore order".
I noticed on Setlist FM that My Sex had a sub note saying that it had a 'false start'.
I asked a Facebook for details and got the below response:
"That was pretty funny, Before the first start Jarvis talked for a bit about how knew about 90% of the lyrics then preceded to forget the first line so he had to look at someone's phone to find the lyrics, then they nailed it the second go"
I would assume that there is a break-even point which varies with the venue/location.
The band would never share this info with us (quite rightly) but it would be interesting to know how much they make from live performances and if there any where they have made a significant profit/loss over the years.
I imagine they made a chunky loss on the gig in Taranto last year. I was there and paid 26 for my ticket, and it was nowhere near full. I expected it be a lean, stripped down gig but it was the full Encore works. I imagine the festival (Medimex) did get some EU/PNRR funding, because there's no chance they made it all back on tickets. And there's no way they'd have chosen to play in... Taranto... without being offered some money up front. Nobody ever really plays south of Rome in Italy, sadly. 90% of international act gigs are in Milan, which might as well be another country.
Happy either way obvs but hoping for more like night one than night two in New York. Lipgloss please, and hopefully Jarvis feels ok about doing My Sex. Are they doing the chanting live?
Slightly cut down set in NYC. The support played 45 minutes (why oh why) so Pulp went on at 20:15, with a strict 22:00 curfew. Couple of Yanks around me at the barrier who had seen Setlist FM and were expecting more, or saying they played that in London. Crowd were good, band were great. They played C*nts Are Still Running The World on the PA at 21:55 after they departed. I queued for about 6 hours before to be first in the merch queue, to be told the signed records the band had put on Instagram hadnt been provided, and have spent a fair whack to see the show with the least songs! Dont let me pick your gigs for you.
Good shout to give Partial Eclipse a spin in place of Farmers which I was worried was becoming undroppable. I think the album would have also been better-served with one rather than both on it.
Looking at AcrylicAft's Insta, it looks like there were some nice lighting effects sorted for the long fade-out of Partial which I guess increases its chances of being played again.
Being in North America hasnt provided me many chances to see PULP, so I dont have much to compare to but tonights Toronto show was the best PULP Ive seen (seen them 6 times), if not one of the best concerts overall.
They seemed genuinely happy, they sounded fantastic, the setlist was amazing, the crowd was fully into it, and the little variations in the instrumentals were great plus I finally got to hear Seconds live!
Hopefully they'll be this good for the rest of the U.S. tour so others get to experience it too.
Great to see Seconds back. No Elysians on-tour so Emma and Rich looking after the Russell bits. I think I've said this before but there was an alternate violin part on the His n Hers 1994 tour where Russell plays an arpeggiated bit with an echo - not sure if this was played Iive or pre-treated but it sounds so good. You can hear it on bootlegs from a couple of shows it was performed at in May '94.
Was hoping the 2025 version would include that but alas...still sounds great though.
Jarvis sounded great last night. He doesn't really do the sing/shout thing anymore at all. He never seemed to need a breath.
I knew a guy at the venue who said it was 8500+ tickets sold. Which is about what they did the two nights at History a year ago; so not such a drop off.
Crowd was good, didn't see any sitters even in the back. They seemed to know the new singles.
The Slow Jam/Farmer's Market section lost some people. I love Slow Jam, but can take or leave Farmer's. A Grown Ups or a Tina would have gone over MUCH better.
Seconds. Come on. Bliss.
I don't love A Sunset as a closer. I saw some people who clearly knew it, knew it was the last song, and were making their way out. It's just a bit light.
That run from OU - Seconds - First time - Misshapes - GTHL - Babies - Common People was a real testament to the sheer quality of this group. A b side, a new song, an a side of unquestionable quality, and then as pure of an anthem as anyone has in their catalog. You have to take it in.
Possibly the best Pulp show I've seen. Pomona was good for obscurities, but this was the total package.
In his dotage Jarvis will only play rarities in small theatres. Just hang in there for another 12-17 years.
Yes, but I will be in my dotage as well. I ammainly going to seated gigs nowadays unless the rest of the audience are older than me (Stranglers and Damned). Of course, I have to stand when the band is on stage as I did with suede at the weekend, but I am too old for a mosh pit.
They've never, ever, flaunted His 'N' Hers enough. Their best album, and they treat it a bit like it's minor Pulp pop juvenilia and that everything started with Different Class. So I'm delighted to see Lipgloss, Joyriders, Acrylic Afternoons, and Seconds all being played in North America.
I think there should always be 4-6 songs from His 'N' Hers and Intro, taken together, played every night. Babies & DYRTFT? will always be played, but there should be more too. Otherwise you aren't getting the full Pulp experience. Different Class is the 'iconic pop breakthrough', This Is Hardcore is the 'artistic masterpiece', etc, and they're both great records, but His 'N' Hers is even better, so, erm, yah booh sucks with a raspberry on top, I suppose. But they should be prouder of it!
Nick said they'd rehearsed both Have You Seen Her Lately? and She's A Lady all the way back in 2023! So, erm, can we have those, please? Also My Legendary Girlfriend, which we know for a fact they've also rehearsed. His 'n' Hers would give Jarvis some fun, too...
-- Edited by lipglossed on Thursday 18th of September 2025 04:34:40 AM
Is this your first time finally seeing them Tricia? Have a frickin' blast!!
@Ian - thanks for catching these US radio links. That one didn't seem to work - its because of that stupid swear filter and Jarvis' surname. Try this: https://tinyurl.com/wyy3mt9w
Another lovely interview by an American DJ with Jarvis. Just the right vibe that you don't get from British broadcasters. Direct but thoughtful and respectful questions, some really good ones too.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Saturday 20th of September 2025 11:53:25 AM
Not my first time but the first time in 13 years! Show was a blast, too tired to say much more. Bob Dylan is in town with Farm Aid and Jarvis regaled us with things he was going to say to Bob Dylan if he ran into him, including a story about falling on his his ass in a Trader Joes because his shoes were wet. I wasnt expected the pics of them when they were younger playing in the background and Ill admit I cried lol. Perfect band as always
-- Edited by triciathetree on Sunday 21st of September 2025 05:42:41 AM
__________________
The trees, those useless trees, produce the air that I am breathing
Is this your first time finally seeing them Tricia? Have a frickin' blast!!
@Ian - thanks for catching these US radio links. That one didn't seem to work - its because of that stupid swear filter and Jarvis' surname. Try this: https://tinyurl.com/wyy3mt9w
Another lovely interview by an American DJ with Jarvis. Just the right vibe that you don't get from British broadcasters. Direct but thoughtful and respectful questions, some really good ones too.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Saturday 20th of September 2025 11:53:25 AM
Of course! I forgot that the dreaded filter applies to links too. Thanks for the updated URL.
Well, 2025 was the year I finally started using RSS feeds. That's how I discovered this and the World Cafe session.
Again, if anyone is able to rip this interview, I will include on my website.
Cool. How did you manage to rip the other one with the live session?
@Tricia - glad you had a great time. Looking at the setlist, Grown-Ups made its US debut (i guess the radio session was a hint) as a sub for Slow Jam and Partial Eclipse came in for Farmers Market. In the encore, Joyriders was played.
Weird that the first two songs of More to be performed Iive and make us think a new album could possibly, incredibly, (surely not?) be on the cards - Hymn Of The North and Background Noise, have barely been heard live since their initial debuts in 2023.
I kind of understand it with Hymn, it's quite an ambitious ballad and probably needs more rehearsal time than most songs (and the string section) but it is a shame.
While I think Background Noise has the most immediate chorus on the record and might have been a single. Really surprised that's been dropped.
Maybe they're holding one of these back for the Mercury's ceremony...
Of course Tina has been a single and that's not been played at all in the US. I guess Pulp just have too many goddamn songs and choices to make. Swapping three or so in and out is probably fair enough - they're a 9-piece so it's more to coordinate. And back in the day, they werent any less conservative with setlist changes mid-tour, were they? One or two on rotation more or less.
A member of this forum found a recording and sent me the link to download it. Unfortunately, I don't know much about ripping audio, I know how to rip from YouTube but that's about it. My phone has a screen recorder feature so I could play and record it that way then separate the audio out. It does, however, record background noise (as in actual background noise, not the song ) so probably not the best idea.
The wiki says "'Man Comes Around' appeared on the printed setlist as an alternative to Lipgloss. It is uncertain whether this is a new song or a Johnny Cash cover."
Can you really see them playing a Johnny Cash cover between "The Fear" and "Help the Aged"? Me neither.
One possible explanation is that they have finished the untitled instrumental that was recorded during the "More" sessions and this is the title.
Ahh! I didn't see the paper setlist ... Maybe the mystery will be revealed at the two Hollywood concerts. I've never seen them put another band/singer's song on their setlist, so fingers crossed for a new song!!
The wiki says "'Man Comes Around' appeared on the printed setlist as an alternative to Lipgloss. It is uncertain whether this is a new song or a Johnny Cash cover."
Can you really see them playing a Johnny Cash cover between "The Fear" and "Help the Aged"? Me neither.
One possible explanation is that they have finished the untitled instrumental that was recorded during the "More" sessions and this is the title.
They've been touring for 9 months now since More was in the can. Plenty of time to have written 3 or 4 new ones in rehearsals and sound checks, especially the rich creative vein they appear to be at the moment (Jarvis pre-reformation too)
Fingers crossed. Writing on-tour and road-testing seems to be an environment that Jarvis has learned to thrive-on.
Maybe taking a break from the band and reconvening "cold" a year or so later puts too much pressure on new material.
Whereas we've already heard that the first spark for More came from Jarvis introducing Hymn To The North at a soundcheck/rehearsal ahead of the Sheff '23 show.
Fingers crossed. Writing on-tour and road-testing seems to be an environment that Jarvis has learned to thrive-on.
Maybe taking a break from the band and reconvening "cold" a year or so later puts too much pressure on new material.
Whereas we've already heard that the first spark for More came from Jarvis introducing Hymn To The North at a soundcheck/rehearsal ahead of the Sheff '23 show.
The best way to avoid writers' block is to never break at an end, but at a middle.
Couldn't find a way to fast forward but it starts at 23 mins and runs for approx 20 minutes. Nice producing from the radio engineer. As the host discusses lyrics off More with Jarvis, they play the snippets in question from the tracks.
In the past, they have written and performed songs on tour that would eventually appear on the next album. They were performing songs from "Separations" in 1987 before "Freaks" was even released then a couple of songs from "His 'n' Hers" in 1992. "Common People" made its live debut around a year before release along with "Underwear". "Help the Aged" was performed in 1996 and I think that "Cocaine Socialism" was written around this time too.
The only possible exception is "We Love Life" where the songs they performed seem to have been written in advance.
Couldn't find a way to fast forward but it starts at 23 mins and runs for approx 20 minutes. Nice producing from the radio engineer. As the host discusses lyrics off More with Jarvis, they play the snippets in question from the tracks.
Love the interview, I stripped and cut the audio to only Jarv part : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pua_eKKGLgF4eqvbsJEMmTuDaYg2p-Y0/view?usp=drive_link
Couldn't find a way to fast forward but it starts at 23 mins and runs for approx 20 minutes. Nice producing from the radio engineer. As the host discusses lyrics off More with Jarvis, they play the snippets in question from the tracks.
I love that. "Oh and what if a new song happens to slip out"!
Love the interview, I stripped and cut the audio to only Jarv part : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pua_eKKGLgF4eqvbsJEMmTuDaYg2p-Y0/view?usp=drive_link
Thanks! Would you mind doing similar for the radio session and interview on the other thread? If you could boost Jarvis' vox on the live songs, even better!
Love the interview, I stripped and cut the audio to only Jarv part : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pua_eKKGLgF4eqvbsJEMmTuDaYg2p-Y0/view?usp=drive_link
Thanks! Would you mind doing similar for the radio session and interview on the other thread? If you could boost Jarvis' vox on the live songs, even better!
do you mean this?
original url: https://www.cpr.org/2025/09/19/pulp-is-back-jarvis-****er-talks-new-music-red-rocks-and-britpops-legacy/
I read about Man Comes Around being listed on their set list for Red Rocks Amphitheater, I got excited as they dont tend to do cover versions in there current guise, but I did some research and Johnny Cash had strong ties to the venue, his performance leading to the venue being used by a lot of country music acts. So it seems like they meant a JC (Cash, not Christ or ****er) cover as a tribute to this fact but changed their mind.
Long time lurker, but didnt want others getting excited about a new song.
__________________
Please forgive any missing punctuation in the above post, this site seems to make most of mine disappear.
I read about Man Comes Around being listed on their set list for Red Rocks Amphitheater, I got excited as they dont tend to do cover versions in there current guise, but I did some research and Johnny Cash had strong ties to the venue, his performance leading to the venue being used by a lot of country music acts. So it seems like they meant a JC (Cash, not Christ or ****er) cover as a tribute to this fact but changed their mind.
Long time lurker, but didnt want others getting excited about a new song.
Jarvis did say in that Uncut piece that he's obsessed with people with the same initials as him so covering a JC song in that venue must have been tempting. Not tempting enough though it seems.
Sounds plausible. But at least it does seem they are working-on or open to the idea of working on new songs per Jarvis' comments on that US radio interview.
Love the interview, I stripped and cut the audio to only Jarv part : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pua_eKKGLgF4eqvbsJEMmTuDaYg2p-Y0/view?usp=drive_link
Thanks! Would you mind doing similar for the radio session and interview on the other thread? If you could boost Jarvis' vox on the live songs, even better!
do you mean this?
original url: https://www.cpr.org/2025/09/19/pulp-is-back-jarvis-****er-talks-new-music-red-rocks-and-britpops-legacy/
No, the World Cafe one - there's a separate thread. Ian has ripped it for the FCL bootleg site but if it could be cut into interview and session parts, that'd be cool. Sorry, don't have the ability, myself!
Curtailed setlist last night - Sorted, Disco 2000, Spike Island, FEELING, Farmers' Market, Hardcore, Sunrise, First Time, Mis-Shapes, GTHL, Babies, Common People.
Brit Award nominations in February or whenever it is nowadays? I know that I'm not comparing like for like but The Cure were nominated last year with their first album in many years so I would say it's possible. Is Jarvis still banned from the ceremony?