I think this now counts as the "midweeks" since the charts are Friday to Thursay and not Sunday/Monday to Saturday like back in We Love Life's time.
I'm actually more interested in how low it plummets in week two. It's a sign of the times that so many acts who aren't overtly commercial or are a legacy group from decades ago, bomb-out of the charts once their loyal fans pre-order five different versions for week one sales.
Two of Pulp's creative uncles, Ron and Russell Mael of Sparks, had their highest UK album entry last week - straight in at number two. It's not even in the Top 100 this week! I remember TIH got stick for dropping from 1 to 7 to 12.
Think they'd be over the moon at that with More.
I'll go with 1--37--79 and then back into the top ten after storming Glastonbury !
Edit: the thread title was censored presumably because the word "tw@t" could be made from chart and watch being put together. FFS! ArrGee, sort out this sh1t!!
-- Edited by Eamonn on Monday 9th of June 2025 06:24:07 PM
Without paying for the forum, there is no way that we can switch the profanity filter off. Seems a bit odd to have something like that as a premium feature.
It's mildly amusing to think of someone going through Roger's Profanisaurus or an equivalent (Urban Dictionary?), to asterisk-out any naughty words and putting them on a list that you have to pay for as part of an extra benefit! How much is premium, as a matter of interest?
And back to the charts, I wonder outside of the UK, where Pulp will chart highest?
Is that just physical sales? If so that's impressive. Different Class did 150,000 in it's first week, 50,000 for This Is Hardcore.
Considering downloads & streams (I know it's hard to compare the present day with the back in the day but I'm doing it anyway) this could become their 2nd most successful album.
-- Edited by weed on Tuesday 10th of June 2025 10:13:53 AM
Yep looking out for it on aus charts. This has to be one of my fav websites if you want to have a look. Like a Power BI dashboard sucking in Pulp data.
I'm actually more interested in how low it plummets in week two. It's a sign of the times that so many acts who aren't overtly commercial or are a legacy group from decades ago, bomb-out of the charts once their loyal fans pre-order five different versions for week one sales.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Monday 9th of June 2025 06:24:07 PM
I remember that usually used to happen back in the 90s too, especially with singles. Came out 99p that first week to "get the f*cker in the charts" (as Babybird put it) then 1.99 2nd week, stuff would pop into the charts then disappear within a fortnight. I was really sad when WLL didn't make no. 1 - looked it up, beaten by Steps greatest hits, and Linkin Park. It stinks, it sucks, it's anthropologically unjust.
And the takings were down by at least a third, as far as Universal were concerned ! All that swanky studio time to be paid for (ie Roger Taylor from Queen's manor) ....yikes.
The band being half-arsed in helping may also have contributed.
And Pulp made it hard for them in fairness. There was no obvious single to sell WLL, sadly. Two years racking-up studio bills for a second time in a row...no new contract or album deal for you misshapes. You can see why a new corporate team of decision-makers once Universal took over, acted in that way.
I can think of three (maybe four) much better opening singles than The Trees though. And that rubbish video! Just a complete misfire, straight out of the gate. I remember my housemate (a non-Pulp fan) being absolutely blown away by Sunrise at Reading 2002, he had never heard it before, despite being an avid consumer of indie music.
I remember hearing Trees being played on Radio 1 for the first time and feeling rather underwhelmed at first. Of course I later warmed to it and it soon became a fave, but it certainly wasn't as immediate as other songs.
Re Sunrise - I just don't know how you get commercial radio (or even BBC) to play a song that takes 3 minutes to fully get going before a long build and release of an instrumental section is repeated. It's just one of those that was an awkward fit on record but a barnstormer live.
Agreed on Trees. Gorgeous but not a single. Minnie is probably the most obvious one but it didn't exactly break new ground for Pulp. A glam-stomper but not as good as their previous ones.
Weeds
Minnie
even Birds (mellow but catchy at least)
BCV as a first single rather than an after-the-horse-has-bolted last gasp.
All of those would've made more sense than Trees/Sunrise for me. Ultimately though, would it have made any difference? Looking back (and especially thanks to the insights in Mark and Nick's books) they were clearly done with it all by 2001/02, and I can't imagine a couple of higher chart placings making much difference to that.
It's a shame they weren't able to catch the wave they were on in 1999, when most of those songs were written. Bit like how Freaks would probably have been more exciting if they'd made it in 1984 rather than 1986. But I digress...
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
Is it bad that having heard the news of Brian Wilson's death, my second thought after feeling shocked/sad was - "****, will Pet Sounds be streamed and bought enough in the next day or so to keep Pulp from getting to number one...?!" ?
Not sure to when this was i.e end of Tuesday or sometime today:
Pulp could secure No.1 with eighth studio album More by MusicWeek Staff Wednesday, Jun 11th 2025 at 6:00PM
Pulp continue to lead the way in the albums chart this week with their eighth studio album More, which has accumulated 26,966 sales so far. Of that total sales figure, 20,414 units account for its physical release, whilst downloads make up 5,187 and streams account for 1,365.
Little Simz holds second place with Lotus, which has 12,105 sales so far, whilst Addison Raes self-titled debut LP has 10,653 sales at No.3. Sabrina Carpenter has returned to the Top 5 at ...
'Sunrise' has a hook though. First time I'd ever heard it, I was sure I recognised it.
It should've been released as a single in 2000. And 'Minnie' sounds so much more like a single than anything else Pulp released between 'Help the Aged' and 'Spike Island' (except for maybe 'Party Hard').
-- Edited by lipglossed on Thursday 12th of June 2025 12:15:56 AM
'Sunrise' has a hook though. First time I'd ever heard it, I was sure I recognised it.
It should've been released as a single in 2000. And 'Minnie' sounds so much more like a single than anything else Pulp released between 'Help the Aged' and 'Spike Island' (except for maybe 'Party Hard').
-- Edited by lipglossed on Thursday 12th of June 2025 12:15:56 AM
"Sunrise" really got people's attention in 2000. By the time it was actually released, the novelty had worn off. I don't think that "We Love Life" has anything that could have been a huge hit. In fact, they abandoned two songs at the time that easily fit this description (After You and Got to Have Love). That said, "Weeds" would have probably been a decent enough comeback single. I don't believe that the top 10 was completely out of reach in 2001.
I think that Island/Universal were chasing hits and to be fair, they did seem to make a lot of effort with Pulp prior to "We Love Life" (for example, "Sorted For E's and Wizz" as a single, the "This is Hardcore" video). When the band left them in 2002, they said it was because they had been offered a "much reduced" record deal. If there were more hits, they may have signed a single album deal and got something out a year or so later. Jarvis did say that they started writing new songs immediately after "We Love Life" was released so we may have got another album.
'Sunrise' has a hook though. First time I'd ever heard it, I was sure I recognised it.
It should've been released as a single in 2000. And 'Minnie' sounds so much more like a single than anything else Pulp released between 'Help the Aged' and 'Spike Island' (except for maybe 'Party Hard').
-- Edited by lipglossed on Thursday 12th of June 2025 12:15:56 AM
Sorry to disagree! XD Leaving aside the fact that "The Night That Minnie..." is possibly the only Pulp song I truly hate, I don't think it's a song that has any commercial radio play. Not to mention how poorly the song's melody fits with its subject matter: a girl murdered by a guy who invites her into his van. I don´t see it suceeding, tbh. For me it's a failed song, but of course i know its only my opinion (I've noticed many people here seems to dislike "TV Movie" which is one of my fav Pulp songs ever, so i might be wrong...)