Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: More (general discussion)


Must Evolve

Status: Offline
Posts: 5417
Date:
RE: More (general discussion)
Permalink  
 


As seen near Santa Monica Boulevard. It's a dirty world...

Screenshot_20250715_151946_Reddit.jpg



Attachments
__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



Must Evolve

Status: Offline
Posts: 5417
Date:
More (general discussion)
Permalink  
 


So Tina is on the 6Music A-list playlist and has been played on Radio 2 drive-time this week. Is it common for album tracks to get such attention or are Rough Trade testing the waters before releasing it as a single - although I'm not sure what that means exactly anymore. But if not a vinyl release, maybe a video?

__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



The Boss

Status: Offline
Posts: 981
Date:
More (general discussion)
Permalink  
 


Tina has a little of the Something Changed about it, albeit with a tad more Pulp wickedness. It'd be a shrewd choice for a third single.

__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Rattlesnake

Status: Offline
Posts: 720
Date:
More (general discussion)
Permalink  
 


A few DC cutouts would look chipper in front of that sign in LA. Perhaps with a crowd of Monroe and Dean impersonators running between them, or something. I dunno. And Jean Harlow, obviously.

Third single from more? I reckon Tina is a shoe-in. I remember it starting the first time I played the album - after Spike finished and I was entering mostly virgin territory, still worried that the whole thing might prove a pastiche (pah!) - and within a few chords I felt the proof Pulp are still the real deal and an ongoing creative force to the pits of my very soul. My very soul!!

Background Noise runs it close, but for me Tina has a touch more sophistication and is less obviously marketable. Both bonuses. Indie credibility: Spike and GRHL are pure pop (and great for that), but Tina is more writerly. Partial Eclipse is great but not marketable enough - the rhythm of the lyrics is too busy at the crucial moment to worm its way into peoples brains after a listen or two.

Id be thrilled if it was My Sex. Pure sass and full of relevance. Capitalise on all those new listeners and earn a few more. Itd be banned from the radio -a wonderful echo of Little Girl with Blue Eyes. But that wouldnt stop that particular demographic hearing it, and to be honest, how many new fans are they going to win in their 40s? Either they know Pulp already but have an Oasis gig to get to, or they havent heard them, and god help them and the rest of us.

50/1 its A Sunset, and therefore the last Pulp release ever. Didnt like that as the name of the last track of More either, and that was before hearing the lyrics. An expensive goodbye though, I suppose, with the royalties thing.

__________________

come alive!

Ian


200% and Bloody Thirsty

Status: Offline
Posts: 1464
Date:
More (general discussion)
Permalink  
 


I remember Blur being criticised for releasing a single after the album a couple of years ago.

I don't think that there's any merit in it unless they can give us something else i.e. B-sides. The only song remaining from the album sessions is the unfinished instrumental. That said, there are alternative versions of album tracks in the vaults (the instrumental of "Grown Ups" from 1997 and at least 2 versions of "Got to Have Love" from 1999/2000). I wonder if they could be released as B-sides.

"Tina" or "Background Noise" would get my vote though I don't believe that this will be the last Pulp release ever. Jarvis has already hinted at new material but I think that they will take a break after the current tour and return in 2026/7.

__________________

What is this feeling called live?
www.feelingcalledlive.co.uk

For the latest Pulp news and information, sign up to our mailing list.

«First  <  116 17 18 | Page of 18  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard