Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Nick on Tour


Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Eamonn wrote:

...and "Crackers" (Sarah Cracknell).

It's interesting/frustrating hearing that they're all such terrible communicators with each other - Jarvis, on the fence about getting together again and then suddenly he tells Nick he's calling round...the rest of them not knowing when the mood will strike Jarvis with regards to new shows or new music etc. The management indulging/used to Jarvis' behaviour. A bit of the Suzanne Catty "Let's fucking do this and tell everyone how great we are!" isn't a bad thing from time to time. Anyone know what she's up to...?


 It is frustrating. Kind of a shame it isn't more democratic in some regards, what with Nick & Mark wanting to mix up the setlist, that doesn't happen, but Jarvis decides on Hymn of the North and suddenly it's the showpiece of the biggest gigs... (Not that it isn't wonderful, of course)



-- Edited by lipglossed on Wednesday 27th of September 2023 01:35:55 PM

__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Deep Fried

Status: Offline
Posts: 94
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Yeah, I reckon a good question for him would have been if he felt frustrated that everything was effectively in Jarvis's control. He's often said on Twitter how it's not down to him etc. Guess he is used to it now.


__________________


Legendary

Status: Offline
Posts: 1010
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Well he does frequently refer to Jarvis as "His Majesty"...

__________________

"It is hammering it down!"



Different Class

Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Don't wanna say too much on the book till ye have all read it but this came through to me that Nick stays a bit out of the decisions. Is that just personality ? I see Russell as giving his view more and I found Steve to come across like that too. It reminds me of reading about Ringo! I thought at times Nick links it back to being a drummer. But I dunno, ever see that Metallica documentary, Lars isn't shy about giving his opinion ;) or other bands I've read about like Fleetwood Mac and Queen. That's heavier music maybe where the drums are louder. For Pulp maybe the words are a big part (but not the only part) of the attraction. Looking forward to hearing your views on the book.

__________________


Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Nick's book is great, his writing style is great, it's full of interesting anecdotes well-told -  I think I prefer it to Freak Out the Squares, though both are obviously grand (and for me, So It Started There has the advantage of being a nice shiny hardback rather than an e-book).

And in all honesty, yes. It's polite and effusive and brimming with praise - about his current bandmates, about Steve and even Russell. Young Nick is clearly in awe of Jarvis, and even now he's grateful to share a band with him. But the book is quite damning; you could argue that despite being less manneredly, knowingly theatrical than Russell's delightful tome, it's more matter-of-factly, bluntly, expository of the tensions and hierarchies within Pulp.

I really don't want to get all gossipy here, but to be quite honest, yeah, there's a reading in there that Jarvis dominated the decision-making, Steve had his ear, and no-one else, really, got a look in. And Russell's no angel in Pulp's history - all that stuff about 'it isn't cool to be in Pulp anymore', and then Nick's quite honest about how frustrating it was with Senior's leisurely Russ-bus touring meaning he was in-and-out all the time (even without flying, he probably could've made a few more of the gigs). But I begin to sympathise with Russell a lot more, which is ironic as Nick's obviously got a load of justified frustrations with him.

But devil's advocate - Russell's point of view - years battling with Fire, trying to pull the group together to rehearse, racking up debt, then suddenly it's over - Jarvis and Candida have moved away - and that's that then. And then suddenly Pulp are back together again, because Jarvis has met Steve. And after the studio sessions? They go and sign to bloody Fire again. So now it's hands-to-the-grindstone, trying to work with Suzanne Catty to tear Pulp away from Fire again, except they end up hating each other and fire her... and then they go and make a record with a fashionable producer who lies to Russell and cuts out his parts (and the others don't argue with him). Russell, Candida and Nick are shut out of the decision-making process. Then Mark joins and Russell's role is diminished further (and poor Mark gets blamed - what was he meant to do? Say no?) But yeah, as for Russell...who wouldn't quit, after all that? Didn't they kind of push him away, really? Should he have just shut up and swallowed it? I don't know. But to be quite honest, I don't think I would have stayed, either. 

I don't really buy into that reading completely, to be honest, even if I've just gone and typed all that up. Russell does seem like a pretty difficult person to work with, and I don't blame the band for simply having had enough by 2012. But also, you sort of wonder if that was engendered earlier in the band's history...

There's certainly some stuff there that doesn't reflect well on certain bandmembers. I feel for Nick, having been overruled all the time and not really seeming to have that much clout in a band he'd been in since 1986.

 

[BOOK SPOILERS] 

Spoiler

 It doesn't surprise me that things petered out without much warmth in 2002 if not everyone in the band had much of a say. It can't have kept everyone so invested.

 



-- Edited by lipglossed on Wednesday 27th of September 2023 07:53:56 PM



-- Edited by lipglossed on Wednesday 27th of September 2023 07:57:30 PM

__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Different Class

Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Fair play on writing all that up, lipglossed! There was one bit in particular that made me sad. Might be the part Sarah mentioned earlier in thread. Pops into my head every now and again since i read it. Bands are hard. I sometimes regret reading too much about the bands I love. It can't be all sunshine and lollipops I suppose.

__________________


The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 4497
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Might be an idea for a separate thread for folk who have alreadtly read so they can discuss it openly without having to use spoiler tags.

__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Jean wrote:

Fair play on writing all that up, lipglossed! There was one bit in particular that made me sad. Might be the part Sarah mentioned earlier in thread. Pops into my head every now and again since i read it. Bands are hard. I sometimes regret reading too much about the bands I love. It can't be all sunshine and lollipops I suppose.


 Ahh, that's a great idea.



__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Jean wrote:

Fair play on writing all that up, lipglossed! There was one bit in particular that made me sad. Might be the part Sarah mentioned earlier in thread. Pops into my head every now and again since i read it. Bands are hard. I sometimes regret reading too much about the bands I love. It can't be all sunshine and lollipops I suppose.


 Made the separate thread! Interested to know what incident(s) you were both thinking of...



__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Someone Like The Moon

Status: Offline
Posts: 885
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Anyone else going to Rough Trade East on the 5th?

__________________


Deep Fried

Status: Offline
Posts: 77
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


lipglossed wrote:

Nick's book is great, his writing style is great, it's full of interesting anecdotes well-told -  I think I prefer it to Freak Out the Squares, though both are obviously grand (and for me, So It Started There has the advantage of being a nice shiny hardback rather than an e-book).

And in all honesty, yes. It's polite and effusive and brimming with praise - about his current bandmates, about Steve and even Russell. Young Nick is clearly in awe of Jarvis, and even now he's grateful to share a band with him. But the book is quite damning; you could argue that despite being less manneredly, knowingly theatrical than Russell's delightful tome, it's more matter-of-factly, bluntly, expository of the tensions and hierarchies within Pulp.

I really don't want to get all gossipy here, but to be quite honest, yeah, there's a reading in there that Jarvis dominated the decision-making, Steve had his ear, and no-one else, really, got a look in. And Russell's no angel in Pulp's history - all that stuff about 'it isn't cool to be in Pulp anymore', and then Nick's quite honest about how frustrating it was with Senior's leisurely Russ-bus touring meaning he was in-and-out all the time (even without flying, he probably could've made a few more of the gigs). But I begin to sympathise with Russell a lot more, which is ironic as Nick's obviously got a load of justified frustrations with him.

But devil's advocate - Russell's point of view - years battling with Fire, trying to pull the group together to rehearse, racking up debt, then suddenly it's over - Jarvis and Candida have moved away - and that's that then. And then suddenly Pulp are back together again, because Jarvis has met Steve. And after the studio sessions? They go and sign to bloody Fire again. So now it's hands-to-the-grindstone, trying to work with Suzanne Catty to tear Pulp away from Fire again, except they end up hating each other and fire her... and then they go and make a record with a fashionable producer who lies to Russell and cuts out his parts (and the others don't argue with him). Russell, Candida and Nick are shut out of the decision-making process. Then Mark joins and Russell's role is diminished further (and poor Mark gets blamed - what was he meant to do? Say no?) But yeah, as for Russell...who wouldn't quit, after all that? Didn't they kind of push him away, really? Should he have just shut up and swallowed it? I don't know. But to be quite honest, I don't think I would have stayed, either. 

I don't really buy into that reading completely, to be honest, even if I've just gone and typed all that up. Russell does seem like a pretty difficult person to work with, and I don't blame the band for simply having had enough by 2012. But also, you sort of wonder if that was engendered earlier in the band's history...

There's certainly some stuff there that doesn't reflect well on certain bandmembers. I feel for Nick, having been overruled all the time and not really seeming to have that much clout in a band he'd been in since 1986.

 

[BOOK SPOILERS] 

Spoiler

 

 It doesn't surprise me that things petered out without much warmth in 2002 if not everyone in the band had much of a say. It can't have kept everyone so invested.

 


[Disclaimer: I haven't read Nick's book properly yet.] [Russell's book did come in a lovely hard back version too - just saying!]

The thing to remember with the reunion tour 'meandering' is that Russell says he was only ever going to do 10 gigs based around the 2011 summer festivals. This was agreed with Jarvis - and I would assume, Russell being Russell, there was a contract stating this. Of course Russell is stubborn - he wouldn't/couldn't commit to anything more than what he signed up for. He was having a lovely leisurely summer tour of UK & Europe and that was that.  

I get the impression Nick has not read Russell's book - which is a shame because Russell's book is actually, in general, very lovely. I am biased of course, and I have read it perhaps more than anyone - other than his editor. 

And regarding the Mark stuff Russell wrote - he does turn it around to say that he (Russell) then had a hissy fit and made himself unpopular with the roadies and pointed out that Mark is actually a really lovely person. And in interviews promoting his book he has said that all the Pulp members are decent people. There was no real bad-mouthing of anyone - not even Fire or Suzanne Catty as he chooses to mention them obliquely or not at all.

It was interesting that Nick said no one knew Russell was invited back for the 2011 gigs until they arrived at rehearsals and there he was.

And it was awkward for everyone. 

 

 ALso - Suzanne Catty is now doing aromatheraphy. HERE

 



__________________

freakingoutthesquares.tumblr.com



Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Zurdta wrote:

 Also - Suzanne Catty is now doing aromatherapy. HERE


 Oh my god what the fuck



__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



Deep Fried

Status: Offline
Posts: 77
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Yeah, there is more on the internet - she might have a facebook page and whatnot too. Stumbled on it a while back when doing a little project.

 

Oh man, I gotta wait before I can respond here.



__________________

freakingoutthesquares.tumblr.com



Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


It's still disappointing knowing that Nick and Mark lobbied for more setlist variety but were overruled...

__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 4497
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Has anyone asked why Hardcore (especially three of the singles) is also being largely ignored? I'm pretty sure that Help The Aged and Party Hard would go down better than Weeds or After You (which isn't a diss on those fine songs, just an acknowledgement that they aren't as well known as the former two).

__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



Street Operator

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Eamonn wrote:

Has anyone asked why Hardcore (especially three of the singles) is also being largely ignored? I'm pretty sure that Help The Aged and Party Hard would go down better than Weeds or After You (which isn't a diss on those fine songs, just an acknowledgement that they aren't as well known as the former two).


 Four tracks 'from' Hardcore (Hardcore, Like a Friend*, Glory Days, Dishes) and four from Intro/His 'n' Hers (DYRTFT, Babies, Pink Glove, Razzmatazz). Of those eight, only five were regularly played. Then you have basically 2.5 from WLL (Weeds/Weeds II, Sunrise). 

For me - too much Different Class, and too much of the same songs from DC. Rotate FEELING out for Monday Morning or swap Underwear for Bar Italia, maybe. But even if they don't want to dilute the amount of Different Class, there's still the possibility of swapping out Pink Glove for Joyriders/Lipgloss/Acrylic Afternoons, or Like a Friend for Party Hard or Help the Aged, or Weeds/Weeds II for My Legendary Girlfriend, which would fill the space of playing 1.5 songs. 



__________________

It's OK. It's just your mind.



The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 4497
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


"Pulp's Nick Banks: "We ain't anything without Jarvis Cocker"

https://inews.co.uk/culture/music/pulp-nick-banks-memoir-jarvis-cocker-reunion-2643540



__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 2300
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Off to the Liverpool talk this evening. Anyone else?

__________________

swaying slightly, drunk on the sun, I suppose



Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


I was there. Fully enjoyed it. Think I saw you Stephen. Feel like I saw a couple of people from here there. I was too shy to say hello sorry.

__________________

Go Easy, step lightly, stay free. - The Clash.

I put the sexy in dyslexia.



Legendary

Status: Offline
Posts: 1010
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


weej wrote:

Anyone else going to Rough Trade East on the 5th?


 Well I have a ticket but my manager messed up the rota despite me asking him last week for the day off.

Fingers crossed I can get this sorted tomorrow.



__________________

"It is hammering it down!"



Loss Adjuster

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


What a weird night, but in a good way.

So I was in Liverpool early doors as I went to Goodison Park for the stadium tour of my beloved Everton FC. Spent the afternoon around Liverpool chilling out, and got to Ohmeohmy around 6ish.

Quite a swaggy upper market bar, fitting in perfectly with the "posh" Strand area of the dockside. Nick walks in to the venue, talks to a few staff at the start - then "Oreet there Scott"......haha he only bloody recognises me from Twitter. Mind, im a face you wont forget in a hurry.

Without spoiling the book or the tour, I wont say too much on that - however I did manage to ask a question from the audience......

"Firstly Nick, can I just thank you for the acknowledgment to Pulp Wiki in the book - us guys who use it, and Bar Italia are grateful for your comments. Do you think that We Love Life would get the deluxe edition treatment considering there are so many unreleased songs from the aborted sessions etc".

NB - "Im only the drummer, bottom of the pile. Youre correct there are alot of songs recorded - but I cant say whether it would happen or not. Id like it to though"

Or words to that extent.....

As I am about to go queue up for the signing, I only bump into the one and only Stephen Bray from good ol' Bar Italia! A pleasent surprise and a nice conversation had whilst im huffing and puffing to Lime St Station like the big overweight oaf that I am.

My bloody train is cancelled!!!! I had to go to Manchester then to Chorley to get home. FFS.

Worth every moment? Hell yes :)

Rachel - shame you didnt make yourself apparent - never need be shy to fellow Bar Italians :) Hope you enjoyed the night.



-- Edited by Scottbloodyfrazer on Friday 29th of September 2023 01:39:38 AM

__________________


Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Haha I thought I knew you! From the start. I was also on front row. Probably about 8-10 people to your right
You were one of atleast 4 I thought could be from here. (Now I know you with the question you asked)
Thank you, I should do, I was very loud and proud back in the early 2000s, I dont have half the confidence I had back then. I thought it was meant to be the other way round?

Nightmare for the trains, sorry about that. But it was good wasnt it like really good !


__________________

Go Easy, step lightly, stay free. - The Clash.

I put the sexy in dyslexia.



Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Pic of the night (by a stranger who I thank so much) 

 

 



Attachments
__________________

Go Easy, step lightly, stay free. - The Clash.

I put the sexy in dyslexia.



Sorted

Status: Offline
Posts: 43
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


Eamonn wrote:

Has anyone asked why Hardcore (especially three of the singles) is also being largely ignored? I'm pretty sure that Help The Aged and Party Hard would go down better than Weeds or After You (which isn't a diss on those fine songs, just an acknowledgement that they aren't as well known as the former two).


 

I don't get why they're so against changing the setlist up? Any theories?



__________________


The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 4497
Date:
RE: Nick on Tour
Permalink  
 


I think it was just logistics tied into the elaborate stage and lighting, which is fair enough in a way. Pulp have never had such high production values live and it fitted them like a (pink) glove.



__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!

«First  <  1 2 3 4 58  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard