A year after Blur rang the bell for last orders with the Pavement-influenced 'Blur', Pulp brought the Britpop party to a juddering halt with 'This is Hardcore', the bleakest of flipsides to 'A Different Class' and the record that saw them - intentionally or not - shooting themselves in the foot. Although it made No.1 15 years ago today (11 April 1998), it had nowhere near the staying power nor mainstream reach of its predecessor. But in its sense of surrender, regret and flashes of panic, it captured the time to a tee.
Jarvis Cocker had achieved everything he wanted. The spokesman for a generation tag was on his lapel and huge fame was his, but it encircled him like a cloying trenchcoat, every fibre wanting a piece of him. 'This Is Hardcore', from the alienating sleeve to the epic sleazy title track, the incongruous lead single 'Help The Aged' to the litany at the close of 'The Day After The Revolution' ("the fear is over, the guilt is over.. the breakdown is over"), is a sloughing-off of fame's skin, a rejection of the Britpop monster. That monster could have been him, could have been the moribund wasteland around him.
It was time for Britpop to go, no doubt. With Blur long since headed for the hills, Oasis settling into creative torpor, and bands like Space, Catatonia, Shed Seven, The Bluetones and Kula Shaker (clinging on with a second album) toiling to sustain its second wave, Britpop was a faded brass-rubbing of itself. Even Robbie Williams was co-opting the scene's tropes in a career then seemingly destined for the dustbin. That was alarming enough on its own. Time to tear it up and start again.
Pulp wouldn't truly start again for another decade and Britpop would probably have dissipated without help as boybands swamped the domestic market and the US came back hard with a new generation, R&B displacing grunge on its visa. But a big grand folly of a scene deserved a big grand send-off and 'This Is Hardcore' is nothing if it isn't a statement.
Familiar, sentimental vignettes like 'Disco 2000' and 'Sorted For E's And Wizz' seem eons away as 'The Fear' uncoils its horror-soundtrack synths and teetering, doomy chords. "This is the sound of someone losing the plot/Making out they're OK when they are not," is the first of reams of lines to pick over, apparently opening a window on Cocker's little soul. The wails, the rattling: we're on a ghost train and we're going in!
Even Cocker's razor wit feels blunted by doubt. 'Dishes' has fun, "I am not Jesus/Though I have the same initials", but the joke's punctured by the reality. Cocker's wondering what the hell we expect from him. He can still swing his impossibly thin hips on the corking Bowie pastiche 'Party Hard' (surely the track that could've saved 'Never Let Me Down') and let go on oh-who-cares rock anthem 'Glory Days', but panic runs through the clever switches of 'Help The Aged' and the coal-black humour of the heavyweight title track's too opaque for laughs.
When the lights come on, there's the beautiful resignation of 'A Little Soul', where Cocker dons a character: his own father. The worry's still there though. He can see himself in his dad after all. Or maybe his future? Cocker's ripping into his own psyche to see if he can find anything he likes, but at least it sounds gorgeous.
If we're really looking for light in this magnificent fug (and let's gloss over lines like "If that's all there is then there's no point for me/So please can I ask just why we're alive?", we'll have 'I'm A Man'. This barreling glam stomp is the most Britpop thing here, but only if Denim or even The Auteurs had led the charge. What a world we could've had, soaked in the 70s rather than the 60s, and rather fewer sharp threads all round. There's yet another alternative in 'Seductive Barry', it feels like an extended intro to Flowered Up's 'Weekender', another possible source text for Britpop if Balearic influences had been allowed to invade all that parochialism.
But 'This Is Hardcore' isn't about forks in the road. It's an end, a hard-wrought epitaph to a band's jaunt in the limelight and a suitable jump-off point for what had been a rare old few years, for us, at least. For Pulp and Cocker it was a sapping drag through the wringer. Drink up, please.
***
Whatever about Jarvis' state of mind during the making of TIH, I can't imagine what sort of a mindfuck it must be to promote Help The Aged on Saturday morning kids tv while fielding questions from 12 year-olds and a few months later the greatest sabotage of all; performing This Is Hardcore on TOTP in front of teenage (wet dream) fans. As Giles put it on acrylicafternoons.com "At the time, I felt a certain smugness at watching them mime This Is Hardcore on Top of The Pops. How brilliant it was that Pulp could get away with releasing a six and half minute porn-drenched single, thrusting it into the top 20 and then performing it on prime time TV in front of a bunch of teenagers. Subversive or what?"
My attitude towards the NME has softened considerably since I stopped reading it entirely 12 years ago. I was just thinking about Britpop might turn out to be responsible for the NME's eventual demise. Since the 90s it's been tied irrevocably to indie music - so as indie music is on the wane, so is their readership. Not sure how they can escape.
I think NME is finding more success as a website these days, which is honestly the way to go in my view of things. It might even cause the editors to drop some of the more tabloid-y content that is really prevalent in both the magazine and the site. Is indie music itself on the wane? Or is it just a reaction to a certain type of landfill indie guitar bands who were oversaturated in the mid-2000s? The indie scene seems pretty healthy to me.
It's print journalism that's on the wane - hence Stool Pigeon closing down, Artrocker going web-only etc. Plus even if indie music is healthy in and of itself, everything is on a much smaller scale than 20 or even 10 years ago: while at one time you might have been able just about sustain yourself from constant toilet circuit touring, self-released (or tiny indie released) 7" singles and friendly write-ups in the back of the music press, that support system isn't really there any more.
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
Pulp brought the Britpop party to a juddering halt with 'This is Hardcore', the bleakest of flipsides to 'A Different Class' and the record that saw them - intentionally or not - shooting themselves in the foot.
I think it is the album that gives Pulp some gravitas. It would have been easier to have done Different Class 2, but to make an album like that was brave and brilliant. When you consider what their peers followed their best selling albums with, Hardcore was the only one that showed a real progression both in content and musicianship. Only shame is they didn't release Cocaine Solialism as a single to precede it.
Is indie music itself on the wane? Or is it just a reaction to a certain type of landfill indie guitar bands who were oversaturated in the mid-2000s? The indie scene seems pretty healthy to me.
Not sure anyone is noticing if it is in rude health. Maybe the mid-2000s bands were, err, landfill (I tend to disagree, that's another story), but at least they got radio play on XFM. Nowadays, what passes as contemporary indie music on XFM leaves me cold, and I'm afraid I'm a bit too lazy to explore.
I blame R&B for the decline of Britpop and chart music in general.
Why? I really don't understand this piece of reasoning.
Well it flooded the charts in the late 90s/early 2000s, and was pretty much the only thing getting played on the radio, along with cheesy dance music. Rock/indie bands became less successful in the charts, and probably less motivated as a result. So I think that was the turning point when chart music declined. The only bands getting any regular airplay at that time seemed to be Coldplay and Travis!
I do feel it slightly erroneous to blame a particular genre of music for the downfall of the charts and, ergo, Indie/rock. It could just as easily be argued that Indie had become a genre of rapidly diminishing returns and the public was fired by a new and exciting style of music that replaced the moribund old style. I always believe that if you want to blame anybody blame the general, record buying, public.
I was just using R&B as an example really. Thinking about it, the problem was the rise of pop groups and solo "artists", and the way they were all promoted heavily by the radio, at the expense of actual bands. A lot of the public wouldn't have even been aware of the remaining british indie bands because they were barely played. I think that's why We Love Life did so badly.
-- Edited by shotoki on Wednesday 17th of April 2013 07:36:39 PM
-- Edited by shotoki on Wednesday 17th of April 2013 07:37:06 PM
Hmm...I still remember the NME cover from the week TIH got to No.1 declaring that for the record do have done so on so few sales (35,000 wasn't it?) made a mockery of the charts and had effectively killed said charts.
I believe Rhianna has since beaten that record with a 10,000 copy selling No.1 album, however.
PS not sure if you'd count the Boo Radleys as Pulp's peers, but...
"When you consider what their peers followed their best selling albums with, Hardcore was the only one that showed a real progression both in content and musicianship."
You should probably take a listen to the amazing 'C'Mon Kids' album that followed their Top 10. 'Wake Up' album. This followed a pop classic with something even more 'difficult' (and probably better) than This is Hardcore. Apparently it spurred Radiohead on to similarly jump from what they'd been used to into OK Computer...
As has been mentioned, the new broom of more sensible, emotional types - Coldplay, Embrace, Texas, Travis as well as Stereophonics' arrival to the big league all enjoyed huge sales around this time. Britpop's big four (Oasis, Blur, Pulp, Suede) were all worn-out by their pop moment with its attendant side-effects and making more time-consuming, (and less pandering to "We gotta seize the momentum and get the next album out within 18 months" record company bollocks) less commercial records by the turn of the century. One "movement" had passed for another, however less exciting it may have been.
Embrace and Texas, god I forget about them. I hated them so much. Everything became so safe and radio friendly.
This is Hardcore is later Pulp at their creative peak, its right up there with Separations and Masters Of The Universe. Considering they did all that after losing Russell makes it even more impressive.
-- Edited by shotoki on Wednesday 17th of April 2013 11:51:50 PM
I blame R&B for the decline of Britpop and chart music in general.
Why? I really don't understand this piece of reasoning.
Well it flooded the charts in the late 90s/early 2000s, and was pretty much the only thing getting played on the radio, along with cheesy dance music. Rock/indie bands became less successful in the charts, and probably less motivated as a result. So I think that was the turning point when chart music declined. The only bands getting any regular airplay at that time seemed to be Coldplay and Travis!
I do feel it slightly erroneous to blame a particular genre of music for the downfall of the charts and, ergo, Indie/rock. It could just as easily be argued that Indie had become a genre of rapidly diminishing returns and the public was fired by a new and exciting style of music that replaced the moribund old style. I always believe that if you want to blame anybody blame the general, record buying, public.
PS not sure if you'd count the Boo Radleys as Pulp's peers, but...
"When you consider what their peers followed their best selling albums with, Hardcore was the only one that showed a real progression both in content and musicianship."
You should probably take a listen to the amazing 'C'Mon Kids' album that followed their Top 10. 'Wake Up' album. This followed a pop classic with something even more 'difficult' (and probably better) than This is Hardcore. Apparently it spurred Radiohead on to similarly jump from what they'd been used to into OK Computer...
I wouldn't really consider them peers in the same way as Suede, Blur, Oasis, Supergrass etc. as I think of them as preceeding Pulp. Suede with Dog Man Star did progress from their debut, but most others did a bad cover of their big album.
As has been mentioned, the new broom of more sensible, emotional types - Coldplay, Embrace, Texas, Travis as well as Stereophonics' arrival to the big league all enjoyed huge sales around this time. Britpop's big four (Oasis, Blur, Pulp, Suede) were all worn-out by their pop moment with its attendant side-effects and making more time-consuming, (and less pandering to "We gotta seize the momentum and get the next album out within 18 months" record company bollocks) less commercial records by the turn of the century. One "movement" had passed for another, however less exciting it may have been.
Getting back to Hardcore, it's for me the strongest, bravest and most inspirational Pulp period in a way, certainly in terms of creativity but only when all the b-sides and some of the dropped songs from the deluxe edition are taken into account. The album as a whole has too many holes but it's still more good than bad and I'll always love it to bits.
a fantastic album no doubt. ... probably my personal second fav after H&H.
but that being said. as great as "help the aged" was. man, that was a hard lead single to swallow. I remember running into NYC to get the import single. staring at the contents nervously waiting to get out of the PATH train and into my car and pop the CD in my discman. finally it comes on and I just stare wondering. . . .WTF?
now i listen to it and i love it. but man. . . .what an unexpected lead. i was afraid of the album after hearing it.