na it was doo doo doo, doo doo doo do doo doo doo (you know!) then it finished
then the next time the same then i think he sang'oh deborah do you recall' but that might not be right as i was shocked he'd got the words wrong, except he didn't as it was just another segment bit. know what i mean?
meant to say there will be lots of bits of jarvis in the backstage bit, sitting next to attenborough and brand - you could see on the screen while filming
candida's head kept getting in the way at one bit it was cute
oh! there was a bit with dolph lundgren about who was the fittest, then there was a bit to the back stage bit, jonathan ross said something like jarvis i'm not being funny but you must be the least fit.. he took that well, i mean he was next to a man in his80s
i bet jarvis is the only one who can do the plank that long and hump monitors.
Adding to that, I wonder if "diaries are empty" just means no gigs, which could most likely mean they would have time for recording. So "diaries are empty" could be true in a way, if you don't count today's performance of course.
-- Edited by Brayds2006 on Thursday 31st of January 2013 10:33:41 AM
Stephen wrote:Does anyone else feel the phrase "our diaries are empty" sounds a little...over-rehearsed...?
Maybe "diaries are empty" means "busy recording"
Example:
November 2012 - 'There won't be any more new Pulp music' means 'Pulp will release a re-recorded old demo track next month'.
Not a lie because After You is not "new", but certainly a form of doublespeak disguising the truth...
It must be hard if you are in a situation where you can't talk about something for whatever reason (marketing?, just not wanting to start a feeding frenzy, pressurise yourself into having to produce something to meet hyped-up expectations ...), yet you are in a situation where you get asked very direct questions. You either a) end up saying something you didn't want to/weren't meant to b) say I can't answer that which is an answer in itself that all sorts will be read into or c) basically lie. I was intrigued in the Q interview when Jarvis was asked about a new album, he said "I'm not stoking those particular rumours" which is just a frilly version of "no comment" to me, it doesn't actually tell you anything about what they are or are not doing, he didn't simply say "no" which would have been the simplest thing.
Agreed. I think the Pulp return has been really good. The drip feed has been far more interesting than if they came out two years ago and laid out exactly what they were going to do. It's exciting when they announce new dates, and release new recordings. They are going to be asked these questions, so best to have a party line to adhere to and leave the likes of us to read betweeen the lines
-- Edited by ArrGee on Thursday 31st of January 2013 10:39:08 AM
But mostly if your diary is empty, it means that you have too much stuff to do and don't have time writing them down. Or you're not having anything interesting in your life to write about. I'd go for the first one in this case.
and speaking of diaries didnt Jarvis said that he never keept diary, thats why he wrote songs, to remember things..
-- Edited by Perfect on Thursday 31st of January 2013 01:58:33 PM
Stephen wrote:Does anyone else feel the phrase "our diaries are empty" sounds a little...over-rehearsed...?
Maybe "diaries are empty" means "busy recording"
Example:
November 2012 - 'There won't be any more new Pulp music' means 'Pulp will release a re-recorded old demo track next month'.
Not a lie because After You is not "new", but certainly a form of doublespeak disguising the truth...
It must be hard if you are in a situation where you can't talk about something for whatever reason (marketing?, just not wanting to start a feeding frenzy, pressurise yourself into having to produce something to meet hyped-up expectations ...), yet you are in a situation where you get asked very direct questions. You either a) end up saying something you didn't want to/weren't meant to b) say I can't answer that which is an answer in itself that all sorts will be read into or c) basically lie. I was intrigued in the Q interview when Jarvis was asked about a new album, he said "I'm not stoking those particular rumours" which is just a frilly version of "no comment" to me, it doesn't actually tell you anything about what they are or are not doing, he didn't simply say "no" which would have been the simplest thing.
__________________
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds.
Just clutching at straws here but knowing Pulp they could mean that their personal diaries are empty because the whole year is going to be spent doing Pulp stuff! Hehe I did say clutching at straws didn't I?!