Makes you wonder what Pulp were intending by offering the track as a christmas present. Did they want it to be just for people who went ot the show or are we just an unwitting adverstising campaign for their new song? Also, what could possibly follow? Surely they can't remain silent about this can they?
-- Edited by saw119 on Thursday 27th of December 2012 06:29:52 PM
I just heard Nemone on Radio 6 promising to play the track later on her show today - before 1pm! Probably while I'm driving my mum to the station with no digital radio in the car, never mind.
__________________
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds.
I just heard Nemone on Radio 6 promising to play the track later on her show today - before 1pm! Probably while I'm driving my mum to the station with no digital radio in the car, never mind.
She's played it just before the end of her programme, she sounded pretty happy. Looks like she got it from Calum's soundcloud judging by tweets - I see Calum's been chatting to Steve Lamacq on Twitter. Don't feel bad Calum, there'll be plenty of Pulp fans out there who will be very grateful while conversely, some of those at the Sheffield show clearly didn't appreciate their gifts enough to take them home.
__________________
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds.
I'm not too thrilled by this song. Too early 90's for me.
-- Edited by Wickerman on Thursday 27th of December 2012 07:23:21 PM
I partly agree, in the way that the backing track especially sounds a bit like Separations with modern technology. Sounds like a cheesy dance remix in parts (sorry). I really liked their sound on the tour, more guitary and less dancey, i thought it worked well on Countdown and was expecting new material to sound like that.
It's still a phenomenal song though, but if they do more, they have to go on towards a more "human" instrumentation and less effects. Coz machines tend to overshadow a band's sound and they'll end up sounding like anyone else.
I still feel like it's a rushed production, even if it's lush and inventive in parts, it doesn't quite have that unique sound Pulp had in the past.
-- Edited by andy on Thursday 27th of December 2012 10:36:12 PM
Me to Liltman! I was hoping for a 12 days of Xmas, but clearly that's now not the case.
However it may not mean more future stuff. They could be 'testing the water' to see what public opinion is... and I've seen nothing but heaps of praise!
I just heard Nemone on Radio 6 promising to play the track later on her show today - before 1pm! Probably while I'm driving my mum to the station with no digital radio in the car, never mind.
She's played it just before the end of her programme, she sounded pretty happy. Looks like she got it from Calum's soundcloud judging by tweets - I see Calum's been chatting to Steve Lamacq on Twitter. Don't feel bad Calum, there'll be plenty of Pulp fans out there who will be very grateful while conversely, some of those at the Sheffield show clearly didn't appreciate their gifts enough to take them home.
Yeah, it was funny that Lamacq was tweeting my personal soundcloud! but yeah, I am glad that it's meant that more people have heard the song, it's had 24744 plays so far! It's not like with bootlegs, where it's quite nice that only hardcore fans can find them cos they're the only ones who are really going to appreciate them- this is an amazing new pop song that EVERYONE should hear, and everyone can appreciate, even if they're not a Pulp fan!
Am I the only one seeing as a way to gauge opinion on whether to do new material?
But they don't really need to do that do they.
I dunno. Jarvis's solo stuff didn't really sell to well and WLL and Hits both were disappointing. The live shows have been a success but there's been lots of chat about being happy not having to do media to sell stuff etc.
I think they would want to be sure before throwing themselves into it. After You may also be the band making sure they can still do it.
Which is a big fat yes.
Am I the only one seeing as a way to gauge opinion on whether to do new material?
But they don't really need to do that do they.
I dunno. Jarvis's solo stuff didn't really sell to well and WLL and Hits both were disappointing. The live shows have been a success but there's been lots of chat about being happy not having to do media to sell stuff etc. I think they would want to be sure before throwing themselves into it. After You may also be the band making sure they can still do it. Which is a big fat yes.
Don't forget their supreme lack of confidence as a band _ I read that yet again pretty recently, I think in connection with the Sheffield show and Jarvis talking about how nervous he always is playing there - "We were never a very confident band". When he was wittering on about it being good of us all to turn up and be so nice to them, I thought that was very heartfelt and not just being polite to the audience. If they haven't entirely dismissed making any new material, I wouldn't be at all surprised at them testing the water like this with a free gift. And I don't think anyone would expect it not to leak into the public domain, though it doesn't have to follow that that was the whole intention in the first place, in some Alistair Campbell-like fashion.
__________________
We'll use the one thing we've got more of, that's our minds.
I love it. I would take it personally as it was made out to be, a nice gift for fans who got a christmas card at the gig.
Part of me wonders though, for fans of Pulp who didn't know the story behind the song being an old demo re-worked, how did the band expect the song to be taken, in the way that if it weren't for all the news sites explaining the songs origins, perhaps some fans would see the song as 'brand new' material.
If it means a step towards a WLL deluxe, I'll be happy. I'm not holding out for anything else, but I'd kill for a hint of just why they did it, someone needs to conduct a Jarvis interview and question him about it!
I personally love it, really love it, but then again I'm pretty into Separations/Gift stuff in particular. Also loved the appearance of the stylophone. Guess anything put out is never going to be everyone's cup o tea but lovely to see such a positive reaction on Twitter etc. If they were looking for a confidence boost, well, here it is. Understand they may not fancy recording-promoting-touring treadmill, but we could get more unreleased tracks, perhaps, or WLL Deluxe.
I thought I read that Further Complications was the bestselling Cocker-related album since Hardcore.
Hmm, maybe in the US. But We Love Life would have sold close to 50k copies (one week in the top ten, two weeks in the top forty). Further Comps peaked at 19 but for his solo career he's on Rough Trade who have managed him for twenty years and they're an independent label so big-sales is not something that either party would be overly bothered about.
For all the disastrous chart position of Hits it still went on, eventually, to go Gold - 100,000 units. Granted, the majority would have been in heavily discounted HMV sales but then so are a lot of big-selling compilations.
If they were to release a record in the current climate replicating the "failure" of WLL would not be bad going in terms of sales. Content is mostly consumed via torrents, youtube hits and spotify plays now. Once Apple launch a streaming service to rival the others, paying a quid for a download is going to be an alien concept to the 16-25 market - traditionally the ones who buy singles the most. Even now you're seeing established indie/guitar bands peaking at really low chart positions when it comes to singles.
An album could still do moderately well but any money-making will for the foreseeable future be tied-up in gigging all over the world like they've done for most of the last 18 months. And I can't see them, Candida anyway at least, doing all that again.
Re After You, I'm a bit surprised that they've resurrected an old song and re-recorded it. I don't think they've ever done that before. Quite admirable really - a clean slate for every era. I hope if any more comes of this surprise, we at least get all the unheard songs from 1999-2000 out of this.
I also love it, but I got in a Hardcore mood because of it, with itunes coming up with The day after the revolution (using the searchwords "pulp" and "after"), whcih I hadn't heard for years probably. I really loved it, sounded very fresh (I mostly listen to early 90's Pulp) and now I'm thoroughly enjoying the This is hardcore album, including songs I mostly skipped way back when. Now itunes is at Seductive barry, hated that in 98. If someone would have play that for me yesterday, I wouldn't have known it's Pulp (blush). still don't like this song very much by the way.