Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Worst review of all time.


The Boss

Status: Offline
Posts: 929
Date:
Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Not in the sense of a panning, three out of five isn't that bad, but more "who is this cunt and how in god's name did he manage to get a professional writing job?"

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/music/review-23982886-pulp-o2-academy-brixton---review.do



__________________


Quantum Theorist

Status: Offline
Posts: 1330
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


It was mentioned elsewhere.  Read a few of this clown's other reviews.  Looks like he prefers more mellow MOR music (George Michael/Coldplay)

However The Independent has a far more positive review.  Perfect.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/reviews/pulp-brixton-academy-london-2347827.html



__________________


Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 146
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


"Undone by the shallowness of their songwriting"

How is this man employable as a credible music journalist? Ripped the article out the paper in the pub pre gig in disgust and screwed it up, no wonder they give the Evening Standard away free.



__________________


The Only Way is Down

Status: Offline
Posts: 4715
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Yeah, when I was on the way to my departure gate at Stansted early on Thursday morning I walked past a stand of two free newspapers - The Standard and The Daily Mail. No surprise that they can barely give them away.

I was in a rush but later on the plane was annoyed I hadn't picked up the Standard as I thought they might have a review of the Wed night gig in it. Just as well I didn't bother.

I'm pretty sure that there's a John Aizlewood that writes for the music mags and I think he's written positive reviews of Pulp and Jarvis stuff before.
Kinda sad that he got a free pass and paid(!) to write such uninformed gubbins when many genuine fans would have given their right arm to see the show.


__________________

Tell mester to f*ck off!



The Boss

Status: Offline
Posts: 929
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


I really don't care if anyone writes a negative review of a Pulp gig, or anything else for that matter, but the sheer ill-informed uselessness of the whole thing and the buttock-clenchingly embarrassing attempts to shoehorn in what he imagines to be clever references just astounds me.

__________________


Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 108
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Aizlewood is a Texas-worshipping cock. The Anti-Hibbert.

__________________


Sorted

Status: Offline
Posts: 37
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


^doubt if he's ever written a positive thing about Pulp. If he did, I'll be surprised. IIRC, he referred to Pulp as the "worst band ever". Damn, I hope someone would back me up on that claim but he did. He probably composed that review days before he saw the gig and finally had the chance to unleash the vitriol incl the right said fred w/ nothern accents joke he's been aching to use,  but then he saw Richard hawley, so he revised his earlier draft and included positive spots, hehe.  He's notorious for giving favorable ratings to awful bands on Q mag  that it doesn't feel celebratory when he gives my fave bands a positive one. He may be vile and mean-spirited but I respect his reviews more than that of Pitchfork. At least that is how he genuinely feels and not a contrarian for contrarian's sake. We were discussing about that infuriating review on twitter and quite a lot of people were surprised he gave a "generous" 3. 



__________________


Cocaine Socialist

Status: Offline
Posts: 569
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


The reviewer comes across as an attention-grabbing little shit that needs a good smack on the back of the head. Using petty snipes to cover up for his lack of knowledge and substance is pathetic and piss-poor.

__________________
I can't help it, I was dragged up


Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 153
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Very thoughtful review of first night of Brixton by Kitty Empire in The Observer today but it doesn't seem to be online yet. I disagree with her about Wickerman though - it was one of the highlights for me.

__________________
Her house was very small with woodchip on the wall


Hardcore

Status: Offline
Posts: 153
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Observer review in online now: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/sep/04/pulp-live-brixton-academy-review

__________________
Her house was very small with woodchip on the wall


Deep Fried

Status: Offline
Posts: 97
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


According to Pulp's publicist: "Russell has been dealing in antique glassware, foraging for fungi, systemising his collection of herbs, writing a geologically themed novel and is currently working on a gay musical set during the miners' strike."

!

__________________


Someone Like The Moon

Status: Offline
Posts: 891
Date:
RE: Worst review of all time.
Permalink  
 


Holden wrote:

According to Pulp's publicist: "Russell has been dealing in antique glassware, foraging for fungi, systemising his collection of herbs, writing a geologically themed novel and is currently working on a gay musical set during the miners' strike."

!


 

well if that isn't better than playing in pulp I don't know what is

__________________

I'm not Jesus, though I have the same initials

mixcloud.com/jasminelightfoot/

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard