Was just going through this and searched for Pulp and was amazed to find that Hits had gone Gold which implies sales of around 100,000 in the UK. How did that happen?
PULP - HITS
Gold Certification (Album) 13 July 2007UNIVERSAL ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 25 August 2003
Certification History: Silver Certification 13 July 2007
PULP - WE LOVE LIFE
Silver Certification (Album) 19 October 2001UNIVERSAL MUSIC (UK) LTD (ISLAND)Released 22 October 2001
Certification History:
PULP - DIFFERENT CLASS
4 x Platinum Certification (Album) 17 April 1998ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 30 October 1995
Certification History: 3 x Platinum Certification March 1996 2 x Platinum Certification December 1995 Platinum Certification November 1995 Silver Certification October 1995 Gold Certification October 1995
PULP - THIS IS HARDCORE
Silver Certification (Album) 17 April 1998ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 30 March 1998
Certification History: Gold Certification 17 April 1998
PULP - DISCO 2000
Silver Certification (Single) 01 January 1996ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 16 November 1995
PULP - MIS-SHAPES/SORTED FOR E'S AND WIZZ
Silver Certification (Single) September 1995ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 25 September 1995
PULP - COMMON PEOPLE
Silver Certification (Single) July 1995ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 22 June 1995
PULP - HIS N HERS
Gold Certification (Album) 01 February 1995ISLAND (ISLAND)Released 12 April 1994
-- Edited by ArrGee on Friday 1st of July 2011 03:15:24 PM
This is common for "Greatest Hits" records. Over time, they tend to overshadow the rest of a band's catalogue because curiosity-seekers and casual fans tend to go straight to the greatest hits record. And why not? Its cheaper, easier to find and you can assume it's all the best songs.
In time, a band will be judged on the merits of its Greatest Hits record, and that's why it's very important to select the right songs.
-- Edited by Fuss Free on Friday 18th of September 2009 03:52:19 PM
Interesting indeed. 'Hits' ''success'' must be through a few years of sporadic sales, augmented by HMV/Online discount sales when you can grab it for a fiver or whatever. That it entered at 71 in the charts was a travesty.
I note the date they give for the release is wrong, and it was awarded Silver and Gold status at the same time. Is it a case of them updating every album once a year or something and they see that a record passed two milestones in that space of time or something?
Also, can you check for actual sales numbers? I'd like to know what has sold more, WLL or Supergrass' Life On Other Planets. The latter charted lower but has a sheet-music book whereas WLL doesn't - that may be down to them having a better relationship with their record label (Parlophone I think, a division of EMI is it?) at the time.
Also, TIH is still between 100,000 - 200,000? Thought it would be higher by now...I reckon it's international sales would be decent enough.
Sorry, I love this sort of stuff. Cheers for posting ArrGee.
Eamonn wrote:Also, can you check for actual sales numbers?
I know from past attempts to find this information that the record industry closely guards actual sales figures. The awards are the best gauge laypeople have to actual sales figures.
I think the secrecy has to do with a combination of image-control and corrupt accounting.
I think a lot of people are tired of the insipid Cowellism that has dominated the charts for the last 10 years and are finding solice in the great music of the past.
If the leap happened in 2007 wouldn't that kind of coincide with Jarvis's first solo album? Maybe people have liked what they hear and decided to investigate Pulp?
I've often wondered whether record sales were based on wholesale orders or actual retail sales figures.
If the figure is based on wholesale, then I'm afraid the Cowells of the world will always be the kings of pop. Big box retailers will always buy crates of the latest pop idol's new record. Those records are priced for large volume sales, whereas independent and special interest records are usually sold in a mix-and-match crate format.
Also, like Weed said, the spike in sales could correspond with the release of 'Jarvis', and the subsequent publicity that record produced. Island might have had crates of unsold copies of Hits, and offered them at a discounted wholesale price to clear their stock. So the spike might not reflect actual people picking up a copy of Hits, but rather, retailers cashing in on low price merchandise at an opportune time.
Eamonn wrote:Interesting indeed. 'Hits' ''success'' must be through a few years of sporadic sales, augmented by HMV/Online discount sales when you can grab it for a fiver or whatever. That it entered at 71 in the charts was a travesty.
Is it a case of them updating every album once a year or something and they see that a record passed two milestones in that space of time or something?
Also, can you check for actual sales numbers?
Also, TIH is still between 100,000 - 200,000?
These are just UK figures from the BPI. The figures are wholesale rather than retail, as the former is easier to track. This explains why some acts go Gold/Platinum on release explains why they are going for £3 at the HMV sale (Yes, Kaiser Chiefs we are talking about you ).
Actual sales are impossible to track, the awards are indicative and I think the date of the award isn't that reliable, it would depend on when the sales were reported.
However with Hits it looks to be a trickle of sales over time and probably at £5 or less. For an album that was considered to be a flop, sales of over 100,000 are impressive. And as Fuss Free says going forward Hits is likely to be the first port of call for those who discover Pulp.
Also, round about 2006/2007 saw he release of he Peel Sessions and Universal Deluxe Editions of HnH, DC and TIH, so people might have been interesed in the rest of the back catalogue as well.
I know in the past only sales from the likes of HMV, Virgin/OurPrice and Woolworths counted towards the UK chart. In full knowledge that in order to have a single in the top ten it would have to be stocked by Woolworths they used to say to the record companies that unless you give us the singles for free we won't stock 'em!
Another reason not to pay too much attention to the chart is the whole business of 'chart hyping' which I won't talk about here for it potentially being a libelous accusation - any record industry type would tell you that it doesn't happen but i know a man who used to do it. So it does!
The real surprise to me is that His n' Hers never crossed the platinum threshold.
That is a ponderer isn't it. I would have thought that the success of Different Class and the Glastonbury appearence would have boosted the sales of His N Hers ten fold
Fuss Free wrote:The real surprise to me is that His n' Hers never crossed the platinum threshold.
Surprised it made gold. A platinum album isn't that easy to get (Elvis Costello only got one).
It doesn't make sense that HnH never went Platinum. Consider:
HnH went gold (100,000) just 2 1/2 months after release (Feb. to April '94)
Different Class went triple platinum (900,000) in less than 6 months after release (Oct. '95 to March '96)
In between those two albums, from June to July '95, the Common People single went silver (200,000)
If only 1 in 4.5 people who bought Different Class from Oct. to March 95 also picked up HnH, HnH would have surpassed the platinum threshold.
Different Class wasn't even released for another 5 months after the Common People single broke through. You would think the success of Common People would have bolstered sales of HnH since it was the only widely available album at the time. Yet we see no evidence of that.
It seems logical that HnH should have tripled it's first 2 months of sales over the course of the 15 years since then, especially since Pulp's popularity has grown exponentially over the years. Then again, if my math is correct, an album needs to sell 36.5 copies a day to achieve 200,000 sales over the course of 15 years. That does seem like a lot.
To put that into perspective, Different Class averaged 6000 copies sold per day from October '95 to March '96. James Blunt, on the other hand, averaged just 3,570 copies sold per day over 28 months (Oct. '04 to Feb. '07). Pulp wins! (not really)
-- Edited by Fuss Free on Wednesday 14th of October 2009 07:13:05 AM
Fuss Free wrote:This is common for "Greatest Hits" records. Over time, they tend to overshadow the rest of a band's catalogue because curiosity-seekers and casual fans tend to go straight to the greatest hits record. And why not? Its cheaper, easier to find and you can assume it's all the best songs.
In time, a band will be judged on the merits of its Greatest Hits record, and that's why it's very important to select the right songs.
As it's nearly Christmas, it is interesting to see the "greatest hits" albums appear. Call me a cynic but I don't see Snow Patrol (the talentless cunts), follwing up their album called "Up To Now" with a part 2. I'm sure their next hits album in 2-3 years will be much the same with another bit of tat added. They must be fucking successful though cos it's a double CD. I thought they'd only ever made three albums....
At least Pulp Hits is a bonafide Hits album, with just one "bonus" track (if only they had replaced it with O.U. [a single if not a hit] and Mis-Shapes it would be definitive).