Tinsley Viaduct if my memory serves correctly is from around 1990/1991 rattlesnakes / death comes to town era - this was when babies was first written after Nick came up with the main riff. I think this also confirms the age too as I have the original demo cassette (well someone else in the thread has still got it ......ahem!!!) of Babies, OU, Space and Live On and the lyrics for Babies we far from complete and that was from 1991.
Trixie, if you can email me away from here - that would be cool - scott@chorley.fm
I'm not really up to scratch with dates of songs and demo's....maybe it's a mish mash of bits and bats..I'm saying that because the song My Mistake I uploaded for you was on a sort of compilation disc with a lot of older stuff...I'm affraid I can only go by what it say's on the disc.....
I'm not really up to scratch with dates of songs and demo's....maybe it's a mish mash of bits and bats..I'm saying that because the song My Mistake I uploaded for you was on a sort of compilation disc with a lot of older stuff...I'm affraid I can only go by what it say's on the disc.....
Hi Trixy
If you want you could have a browse through the Pulp Wiki recording sessions section here - that might help you get some idea of what tracks you have and where/when they come from.
I can only echo what everyone else has said - thanks so much for uploading the track, I certainly never thought I'd hear it. Obviously if you wanted to give us any more of your wealth, you would become very popular around these parts indeed!
As for Take Me To Tinsley Viaduct... never heard of it. I can think of a couple of possibilities: it could be a lyric from one of the 99/00 demos that we've never heard, or it could be a song from a rehearsal tape that never got any further (what's the sound quality like?). As Scott says, Babies was being played live (with lyrics) by mid-1991 so that instrumental version is probably a rehearsal from the early half of '91. Either that or it's a mix that somebody took home during the studio sessions in '92 before vocals were added. Either that or you're having us all on
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
That was a great track! Thanks for uploading that. My 8 year old son loved it and now wants to hear more Pulp.
These precious gems just need to get into the right hands so they can all get uploaded into baritalia2005. I keep planning to make up extra Pulp albums rather than just leaving all these tracks scattered on a PC.
Well I hope I will be able to put something else on soon..
Thanks Mark, I will comb through pulpwiki and try get some clarity on the demo's....I'm not that clued up on pulp pre "his and hers"...and I have a feeling that some tracks were given names and then changed to be something that most people have heard...but as I have said before at the moment all I can go on is what's written on the disc or inlay....!!
Well I'm not sure if this is unheard or not but have a listen, it's called "about you"....it was on another demo, again with lots of well known tracks.
Bloody hell! Thanks Trixy, that is indeed very much unheard.
The song's actually called 'After You', another 2000 demo described by Nick Banks as an "absolute lost classic". With some justification, I'd say.
I'm not normally one to do the whole "Why didn't they put (insert name of unreleased song here) out as a single, it would've been a surefire hit", but in the case of this one, which languished in the vaultes while The Trees and Sunrise limped into the arse-end of the charts.... WHAT ON EARTH WERE THEY THINKING?!
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
that's just great. i don't think this sounds like anything else in the Pulp catalogue. We Love Life seems like it could have been a monster. is it just me, or do the lyrics on My Mistake and After You seem downright inspired alongside some of the stuff on WLL?
Its a great tune and I have to say - its quite a commercial number and would have been a far better choice than Trees/Sunrise. Lost classic? Its not there with Death Comes To Town, BUT....its certainly a rocker....
Sturdy hit the nail on the head - what the f'in hell were they thinking (or jarvis more so) about shelving that? Id have gotten rid of Birds to have that !!! Trixy, if you have any questions about the demos - Sturdy (bygones?) and myself are very up on dates and what not, so dont hesitate to get in touch with us. Thanks so much for these Trixy, you certainly have made alot of people smile
Sturdy - do we think this is actually After You, or Disco Too Disco? As there is a reference to that in the lyrics, and im sure that there was a demo called Disco Too Disco at this time?
A relisten and im 90 percent sure its After You...lol
According to the demo page on the official site After You started off life as Disco Too Disco (and this is what it was known as during it's original demo - the same recording session where the My Mistake demo came from perhaps). It also says that another unheard demo, St Just, began as Disco Too Disco aswell which is a bit confusing.
Anyway...this song has been the holy grail for me since I read Nick Banks and Geoff Travis' ringing endorsements of it in Truth & Beauty and a Pulp People magazine. Rattlesnake, We Can Dance Again and now this all in demo form were all long-desired. Strange that with the click of a mouse (and a very kind heart) somebody can just unleash them onto the world. Thanks again Trixy.
The song is a lot different to what I expected - I was sure it was going to be a pretty, swooning ballad in the vein of Birds In Your Garden and Cuckoo. It's not only very different to those song but it's very different to anything Pulp ever released. Very modern, radio friendly guitars (at first I thought it was a Craig David pastiche or something!),so instantly catchy that it doesn't need a sing-a-long chorus. The lyrics are fantastic - both the actual words and how they fit into the rhythm of the song itself - "From Safe-way to Tes-co to the Se-ven E-lev-en". Could maybe have have been huge, would certainly have made We Love Life more loved.
Ahh - i knew I wasnt going crazy!! Cheers for clearing that up - yeah the names are a little misleading, but at least we know its definately After You thats all that matters ! Im really interested to hear Candy's Sceptre to see how Bad Cover Version originally sounded
Bloody hell! Thanks Trixy, that is indeed very much unheard.
The song's actually called 'After You', another 2000 demo described by Nick Banks as an "absolute lost classic". With some justification, I'd say.
I'm not normally one to do the whole "Why didn't they put (insert name of unreleased song here) out as a single, it would've been a surefire hit", but in the case of this one, which languished in the vaultes while The Trees and Sunrise limped into the arse-end of the charts.... WHAT ON EARTH WERE THEY THINKING?!
I believe Island records became the ultimate downfall for Pulp. There was an interview a couple of years ago where Jarvis said that when the record company got bought out there was a change of management and the band had less control over their records. Island kep't banging on about 'Trees' and eventually settled for a double 'A' side with 'Sunrse'. Personally, I think it's a crime that 'Weeds', 'Mini Timperley' and 'Birds' weren't the singles from that album - but that's just my humble opinion.
I remember Jarvis also stating that he regrets 'Dirty World' not being on TIH.
As for 'After You' -it sounds great but perhaps (when you think back to the state of british music around 2000/2001) they thought it was a little too 'Craig David' to put out.
All these factors amount to songs being 'lost' or put aside for another day. Perhaps if it had been the other way round and it was 'Trees' that had just surfaced today we'd be grateful to hear that and wonder why it wasn't on the record.
Thank God for the internet! Long live Trixy! (I must buy you a drink one day!)
Wow. That would've been the best track on the album, & probably Pulp's 3rd No.2 single (he joked). No, it's a definite hit. I reckon they left it because of the obvious comparisons with Pink Floyd (electric rhythm) & New Order (melody line). But with those lovely keyboards (again!) & Jarvis' distinct vocal, it definitely sounds Pulp enough to me. I disagree about it not sounding like any other Pulp material, tho'. I was thinking Countdown?
It also sounds a lot better sound quality wise than what I continue to refer to as Scott Walker's poor production on WLL. In fact, apart from that bit where it goes out of time, it doesn't sound like a demo at all...if what weed says is true, aren't Island pricks!! It could have matched Common People's success without much bother.
Still, I don't think it's too late, the musical climate seems to be coming round to this kind of sound again. Jarvis, get Pulp back together & release it! Please!
I'd like to add my "Wow!" and "Thank you!" to all the rest. After You is great, and (at the risk of re-igniting the David Bowie argument) it reminds me of Stay from Station To Station, the vocal phrasing and vaguely Latin rhythm in particular. Great to hear some POP rather than plodding indie-rock, too...
Come to think of it, the opening is quite reminiscint of The Secret Life Of Arabia from the "Heroes" album too. Of course the connection in Bowie terms is Carlos Alomar.
I'd like to add my "Wow!" and "Thank you!" to all the rest. After You is great, and (at the risk of re-igniting the David Bowie argument) it reminds me of Stay from Station To Station, the vocal phrasing and vaguely Latin rhythm in particular. Great to hear some POP rather than plodding indie-rock, too...
Come to think of it, the opening is quite reminiscint of The Secret Life Of Arabia from the "Heroes" album too. Of course the connection in Bowie terms is Carlos Alomar.
-- Edited by The Idiot at 20:14, 2008-04-19
Wow, you took the words right out of my f***ing mouth!
I don't think it's particularly Scott Walker's fault, but I agree there's clearly a certain spark and freshness in these demos that is more elusive on the album (which I still really like regardless). My theory is that they just messed around with it for too long, over two years of endless writing, demoing and false starts and crises of confidence. By the time they finally managed to get the record finished, the whole project had lost the momentum it had at the start. If they'd just got on and recorded the thing properly when they wrote it in late 99/early 2000, it would have been a much better piece of work.
In fact, how's this for a theory: Pulp was a brilliant band that just could not make records. As a live band they could be tremendous, the songs were consistently great, the demos were always good, but whenever they found themselves in the studio doing it for real, they blew it. Overproduction, underproduction, bad choices of songs, crippling uncertainty over musical direction, you name it. Every album they made (with the possible exception of Different Class) falls considerably short of the potential that the material had.
Discuss.
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"