I think we all would have guessed that any new Pulp album would likely come out on Rough Trade. As the news/press release says, they've already managed them since 1993. Also, Jarvis/Jarv Is... albums have come out through their label.
But this news is extra-exciting because there's no doubt now that a brand new album is coming and Mark's "Yeah, we've written shit loads of songs but I don't know if anything will happen with them" can be ignored! They must have recorded a fair bit of it already or at least demo'd with a producer in mind to bother putting out this news. Otherwise it just creates pressure on them to get it all done and we know they dont like that. I can't see them spending months on a hot-shot producer like Mark wants. I bet they're doing it themselves or working with Jason Buckle at Ant Genn and Martin Slattery's studio like for "Beyond The Pale".
Regarding reissues of Island/Universal albums, could someone please ask Mark at the the TIH playback event this weekend (bet he's annoyed he has to be more direct with questions about the future now!) whether the rights to Pulp's recorded output from 1992-2002 will ever revert to the group? If not, I'm not sure this deal makes a difference. Unless RT make Universal an offer for them which I doubt they'd have the budget for unless the band members put up some of the money? Not sure how these things work. Maybe it just needs Rough Trade's expertise in the area where they put together an offer to Universal and promise them a percentage share of the revenue with RT/Pulp taking the risk of absorbing all the costs involved while the music is licensed by Universal.
They might be open to that as Universal are a massive company and without individual champions of an old legacy group, these things are way down on their priority list. And I doubt there's anyone left from the old Island days who championed Pulp like Nigel Coxon (?) - the guy Sturdy got a really good insight from in Truth And Beauty as to Pulp's relationship with their corporate overlords back in the day.
Soft Cell are comparable in some ways to Pulp, both in style and size. They have had a reissue campaign over the last few years through Universal, beginning with a 6 disc anthology set and a best-of followed by a superdeluxe reissue of their most famous album, the debut, and the band's management and archivists have already mapped-out the contents of superdeluxes for their final two records. However they mentioned this year that staff-downsizing at Universal has delayed these projects. In the meantime, they released a comeback album a couple of years ago on a different label.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Thursday 12th of December 2024 01:51:00 PM
Right, let's play a game. What could be the most disappointing possible outcome of this news?
Shed Seven had a number one LP this year with orchestral versions of their greatest hits.
James did that as well in 2023. Peaked at #3. Most disappointing would be the original LPs reordered/reimagined with tracks removed and B-sides added like The Gouster and Waiting In The Sky by Bowie. Like sticking Babies and Razzmatazz on His n Hers.
Its Friday the 13th here... I just had to explain to my partner the interesting arrangement because he was like werent they on Island... something is brewing!!!
I'm pretty certain that there will be a new album now. Even if it's just a one album deal, it may boost their popularity enough for Island to finally release a "We Love Life" deluxe. Best of both worlds.
In defence of Shed Seven, they released a brand new album earlier in the year and the compilation of re-recordings was an attempt to stop their previous record company from releasing another "Greatest Hits" style compilation.
Regarding reissues of Island/Universal albums, could someone please ask Mark at the the TIH playback event this weekend (bet he's annoyed he has to be more direct with questions about the future now!) whether the rights to Pulp's recorded output from 1992-2002 will ever revert to the group? If not, I'm not sure this deal makes a difference. Unless RT make Universal an offer for them which I doubt they'd have the budget for unless the band members put up some of the money? Not sure how these things work. Maybe it just needs Rough Trade's expertise in the area where they put together an offer to Universal and promise them a percentage share of the revenue with RT/Pulp taking the risk of absorbing all the costs involved while the music is licensed by Universal.
They might be open to that as Universal are a massive company and without individual champions of an old legacy group, these things are way down on their priority list. And I doubt there's anyone left from the old Island days who championed Pulp like Nigel Coxon (?) - the guy Sturdy got a really good insight from in Truth And Beauty as to Pulp's relationship with their corporate overlords back in the day.
Soft Cell are comparable in some ways to Pulp, both in style and size. They have had a reissue campaign over the last few years through Universal, beginning with a 6 disc anthology set and a best-of followed by a superdeluxe reissue of their most famous album, the debut, and the band's management and archivists have already mapped-out the contents of superdeluxes for their final two records. However they mentioned this year that staff-downsizing at Universal has delayed these projects. In the meantime, they released a comeback album a couple of years ago on a different label.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Thursday 12th of December 2024 01:51:00 PM
Although Island own WLL, I wouldn't have thought they own the unreleased songs. Especially the Depot and Wessex demos, weren't these done in Steve's home studio, so not even using Island resources.
So while in theory you can't do WLL Deluxe without CD1. There could potentially be a standalone 'demos' release from a new record company. A bit like Mansun did with Kleptomania.
Although Island own WLL, I wouldn't have thought they own the unreleased songs. Especially the Depot and Wessex demos, weren't these done in Steve's home studio, so not even using Island resources.
So while in theory you can't do WLL Deluxe without CD1. There could potentially be a standalone 'demos' release from a new record company. A bit like Mansun did with Kleptomania.
It depends on the contract. If they signed something that include all their recordings during the period or not, regardless of studio or gear used. There is no way to know.
Although Island own WLL, I wouldn't have thought they own the unreleased songs. Especially the Depot and Wessex demos, weren't these done in Steve's home studio, so not even using Island resources.
So while in theory you can't do WLL Deluxe without CD1. There could potentially be a standalone 'demos' release from a new record company. A bit like Mansun did with Kleptomania.
It depends on the contract. If they signed something that include all their recordings during the period or not, regardless of studio or gear used. There is no way to know.
Potentially a clue - After You was released copyright to Rough Trade, but published by Universal.
Although Island own WLL, I wouldn't have thought they own the unreleased songs. Especially the Depot and Wessex demos, weren't these done in Steve's home studio, so not even using Island resources.
So while in theory you can't do WLL Deluxe without CD1. There could potentially be a standalone 'demos' release from a new record company. A bit like Mansun did with Kleptomania.
It depends on the contract. If they signed something that include all their recordings during the period or not, regardless of studio or gear used. There is no way to know.
Potentially a clue - After You was released copyright to Rough Trade, but published by Universal.
Yeah so potentially demos recording from WLL are not owned by any record label. Why did they sit on it for 26 years then ? Weird. Maybe they just bought back the right for that song only.
On the other hand, the demos released in 2006 were apparently owned by Island, since the deluxe versions are indeed Island records... I dont know, There is no way to know
Every discussion turns to the WLL demos... you lot just need to snog them already :D
Well its Pulp's biggest career mistake. Twice. 1. Not recording them properly, and not releasing them 2. Not releasing them as part of the reissue. Few bands fucked up their last record like that. In a big way. Its our Holy Grail.
after what Mark Webber said on the TIH Q&A, I think we'll get the new album in 2026, or fall 25. or never.
They dont need a new album to cash in for festivals, so fall 25 makes sense, to maybe do a bigger tour on their own. Fall would be nice, since 2025 is the year of the return of britpop, with Oasis back, they should ride the wave.
I would hope/think that if they are doing Glasto, we'd at least have a single released prior. But yeah, album-wise, hard to know as Mark has been cagey. I imagine next autumn at the earliest if recording goes smoothly (which it hasn't, since summer 1995!).
I would hope/think that if they are doing Glasto, we'd at least have a single released prior. But yeah, album-wise, hard to know as Mark has been cagey. I imagine next autumn at the earliest if recording goes smoothly (which it hasn't, since summer 1995!).
the pressure must be immense. First album in 26 years, i mean, i suppose every sound, every note, every lyrics, every production idea is being debated, analyzed, criticized. Must be fun (or hell)
Not quite 26 but it will be around 24 if they release one next year as "We Love Life" was released in October 2001.
I think that I said elsewhere that if Pulp's popularity increases due to a brand new album, Universal may wish to cash in by releasing something we haven't already heard. Either super-deluxes of the "Big 3" and/or a "We Love Life" deluxe. I'd personally settle for those CDs in Mark's photo
Not quite 26 but it will be around 24 if they release one next year as "We Love Life" was released in October 2001.
I think that I said elsewhere that if Pulp's popularity increases due to a brand new album, Universal may wish to cash in by releasing something we haven't already heard. Either super-deluxes of the "Big 3" and/or a "We Love Life" deluxe. I'd personally settle for those CDs in Mark's photo
There's room for for a Big 3 and the Super Sub together, really. The last deluxe where 18/19 years ago, they could just re-release them and add new stuff, with new remasters as well and release WLL deluxe too. The market for that kind of releases is even bigger than new albums. Low cost, big cash. Lets go.
The more I think about it, the more ridiculous it seems that there's no deluxe WLL, or Intro come to that. So what if they didn't sell as much as the others? Did It and Freaks need big sales figures to justify Fire putting them out with bonus tracks? I can't think of many bands from 20+ years ago or more who haven't had that treatment. Including loads who were nowhere near as big as Pulp, even in their twilight years. There's a Kingmaker box set, I mean come on!
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
Well, exactly. It's the curse of your legacy recordings being the copyright of the biggest record company/entertainment "house" in the world. Pulp are just a little pawn. But if Rough Trade have a good relationship with Universal (and the "After You" release suggests possibly so) maybe they could license them across.
Re the new album, how does it work, Mark? Would Pulp have an A&R person assigned to them from Rough Trade to check on the volume/quality of new material and help make an album out of it? Or, because they've been managed by Geoff and Jeanette for 31 years on and off, do the group have carte-blanche to release anything they want?
-- Edited by Eamonn on Thursday 19th of December 2024 10:31:26 PM
Well, exactly. It's the curse of your legacy recordings being the copyright of the biggest record company/entertainment "house" in the world. Pulp are just a little pawn. But if Rough Trade have a good relationship with Universal (and the "After You" release suggests possibly so) maybe they could license them across.
Re the new album, how does it work, Mark? Would Pulp have an A&R person assigned to them from Rough Trade to check on the volume/quality of new material and help make an album out of it? Or, because they've been managed by Geoff and Jeanette for 31 years on and off, do the group have carte-blanche to release anything they want?
-- Edited by Eamonn on Thursday 19th of December 2024 10:31:26 PM
Looking at what Jarvis did solo with Rough trade, id say the road is wide open and the Label is just waiting for the rough mix of the new album. Or even the finished album. They are not in a weak position anymore, i highly doubt anyone from the label will come and tell them what to do or even give one remark.
Day one on the Rough trade desk, Day 2 in the shop (almost )
Peel Sessions has disappeared off of Amazon Music too. You can't buy the MP3s. It's in danger of becoming a rare release if there aren't enough second-hand CDs in circulation.
Peel Sessions has disappeared off of Amazon Music too. You can't buy the MP3s. It's in danger of becoming a rare release if there aren't enough second-hand CDs in circulation.
It's so annoying. My favourite best-recorded versions of Pink Glove and Acrylic Avos are on there.
Plus the Pencil Skirt and Underwear renditions have a lovely, alternative instrument-arrangements in places and a raw feel that you get from great early demos of songs which they effectively are.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Sunday 22nd of December 2024 11:53:07 AM
Yeah...I kinda sit on the fence re late-era Pulp live perfs (1998- 2002). There is a musical strength and professionalism to it that the 1991-'94 gigs lack, so all the hard touring from being a huge-selling band in '95/96 clearly affected what came after.
But even though I kinda like the four Island albums more or less equally, if I'm seeking out live stuff from Pulp to listen to, I'll usually choose something from 1987 to 1994 cos it's just more...fun.
The more I think about it, the more ridiculous it seems that there's no deluxe WLL, or Intro come to that. So what if they didn't sell as much as the others? Did It and Freaks need big sales figures to justify Fire putting them out with bonus tracks? I can't think of many bands from 20+ years ago or more who haven't had that treatment. Including loads who were nowhere near as big as Pulp, even in their twilight years. There's a Kingmaker box set, I mean come on!
Oooh - what would you envisage turning up on disc 2 of an Intro Deluxe LP?
Nothing that's not common knowledge, there wouldn't be any lost songs like on the other Deluxes. But I think there are plenty of good demos and radio sessions from 1992 that would fill out a worthwhile "Intro Plus" very nicely.
__________________
"Yes I saw her in the chip shop / so I said get yer top off"
I asked Mark about the new album when I met him this week (see his Book thread). He was a bit coy as you'd expect but it sounded like it might already be done.... Oh and those worried about a Pulp album produced by Jack Antonoff (which Mark has expressed a desire for, and indeed did again during the talk), might be relieved to know that when Mark suggested Antonoff to Jarvis, JC said he had never heard of him! And also, Mark added, Antonoff would be too expensive. He also said they're keen for new material to come out this year as they don't want to hang around.
The right producer can get an album done in 3 weeks.
Youth (Martin Glover) has a process of 1 song per day - introduce the demo over breakfast, finish it by dinner time. And that often includes demanding requests like - sit there and write an extra bridge for that in the next half an hour. Bands come out of the 3 weeks with a complete album plus a couple of spares for b-sides/deluxe editions.
Jarvis' mate Steve Albini has always been similar. Nirvana did In Utero from start to finish with him in 2 weeks.
If you spend months in a studio - like the Las or Stone Roses fell into - you just end up up your own arses.
-- Edited by HoltbyCity on Sunday 2nd of February 2025 05:02:38 PM
True, and I think that the bulk of "Different Class" was recorded pretty quickly when "Common People" became a huge hit.
Also, we got the first airing of new material in July 2023, around 18 months ago. Take "This is Hardcore" for example, we heard "Help the Aged" for the first time in August 1996 then the album was finished in January 1998 and on the shelves in March so these timeframes are relatively comparable.
Some great information from Eamonn there, of which we are all really appreciative of.
This Pulp album, if you think about logically will have been nailed down between shows, and now there is nothing on the horizon for a while (also the lack of social media activity) - means to me that the album is being produced right now.
I honestly think that the album will be released in the Autumn. Especially with Marks hint.
10 fully formed songs new have been played live since 2021, if you include the 3 from the tail end of Jarv Is. That's a good base, even if there's not many more surprises left in the locker (which hopefully there are).
I asked Mark about the new album when I met him this week (see his Book thread). He was a bit coy as you'd expect but it sounded like it might already be done.... Oh and those worried about a Pulp album produced by Jack Antonoff (which Mark has expressed a desire for, and indeed did again during the talk), might be relieved to know that when Mark suggested Antonoff to Jarvis, JC said he had never heard of him! And also, Mark added, Antonoff would be too expensive. He also said they're keen for new material to come out this year as they don't want to hang around.
To be fair if I hadn't seen Edgar Wright's Sparks documentary I wouldn't have heard of Antonoff either.
Hopefully before then, late-year albums are less likely to get nominations for record of the year. And we want Pulp to sweep the boards so they're more likely to make another record
They're not the most confident, they need to be loved at large.
I just noticed that the Pulp graphic on the Gigs & Tours site has alternative visuals. Could this be a hint at the album artwork? My first thought from an initial glance was that it was one of the images from the DC sleeve but then I saw the snow-capped mountain which made me think of the Pulp party trek up the Andes led by Steve in 2012.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Friday 21st of February 2025 10:26:13 AM
Was wondering the very same thing - where are those mountains? It was a nice touch to see the cut outs but sad it's down to 4 people now. Grateful we've still got those 4 though.
Does this confirm that Pulp are still the four core members? Maybe the album will be credited as Pulp & The.... somethings (ie Emma, Andrew, Adam and whoever else). "The Is... ? As in the non-Jarv part of Jarv Is... Or maybe not.. Maybe just Pulp but writing and recording credits for applicable personnel.
Dexys Midnight Runners' most successful record is actually credited to the lead singer Kevin Rowland plus the band. To add confusion, the fiddle section were actually called The Emerald Express. But it's only ever referred to as a Dexys album i.e not a collaboration.
Does this confirm that Pulp are still the four core members? Maybe the album will be credited as Pulp & The.... somethings (ie Emma, Andrew, Adam and whoever else). "The Is... ? As in the non-Jarv part of Jarv Is... Or maybe not.. Maybe just Pulp but writing and recording credits for applicable personnel.
Dexys Midnight Runners' most successful record is actually credited to the lead singer Kevin Rowland plus the band. To add confusion, the fiddle section were actually called The Emerald Express. But it's only ever referred to as a Dexys album i.e not a collaboration.
I don't know, I always felt this was a pretty definitive statement that they were now formally in: https://x.com/welovepulp/status/1666425691146002436
Yeah, I made a similar point on the other thread. It's just interesting that Pulp decide to put in a nod to the past in such a tiny way (literally - most people won't notice the cut-outs).
It will be interesting to see if the album gets its own tour after the record comes out. Hopefully so and if at smaller venues, all the better for us.
2025 is the year to celebrate 1995. It was the britpop year. Oasis is doing it, maybe some other bands are doing it too i dont know ?
It would be silly for those bands not to jump on the occasion.
So maybe the new album album could be pushed back next year to make room for reissues ? That's a possibility.
What would be the point of a DC reissue? It's already had multiple, including the extensive deluxe edition. And the vinyl of the last pressing is still available from HMV and Amazon for just over £20. I just can't see any market for it.
There was a 25th anniv edition planned but Covid kiboshed it.
Many classic albums get multiple reissues as time goes by, there's still a market for them. In fact, Universal are more likely to do DC again with only a little new content (Glastonbury '95 live is the obvious extra) than they are to do a deluxe of We Love Life despite the latter having much more unreleased material.
Also, the DC aperture vinyl version with all the different inserts has never been reissued and goes for silly money.
But I don't see it being important enough to dictate the release date of Pulp's comeback. Plus they're on different labels. Universal might hold back future reissues to see how new Pulp is received by the public. Then it's easier to piggy back with archive releases and the new album helps serve as marketing for the reissues.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Sunday 23rd of February 2025 10:08:17 PM
Thing is you never do a reissue and new album at the same time, even if on different labels. It must be agreed on before with the band such details. ' If they can cash in on a "bigger" DC anniversary reissue, why wouldn't they ? If there is still stuff to release that is.
But it wouldnt make any sense to release both at the same time, although we have seen bigger marketing mistakes before...
-- Edited by andy on Monday 24th of February 2025 01:18:12 PM
A couple of singles before/during the UK arena tour, new album in the summer then "Different Class" 30th anniversary remaster/reissue at the end of October.
As far as I know, there aren't any completely unheard songs in the vaults from the "Different Class" period but there are demo versions of most songs from the album. Therefore, a 3CD reissue is certainly possible.
Thing is you never do a reissue and new album at the same time, even if on different labels. It must be agreed on before with the band such details. ' If they can cash in on a "bigger" DC anniversary reissue, why wouldn't they ? If there is still stuff to release that is.
But it wouldnt make any sense to release both at the same time, although we have seen bigger marketing mistakes before...
-- Edited by andy on Monday 24th of February 2025 01:18:12 PM
Sure but I don't think this would get first preference over a new record. After 24 years, they're unlikely to stall their comeback for the anniversary of an old album.
If they want to release "Pulp - More" (if that's the title) in Sep/Oct, I'm sure they will.
-- Edited by Eamonn on Monday 24th of February 2025 02:52:37 PM
Good shout, nice pacing. I listened to most of the new ones at the weekend from the Youtube uploads of the performances in the US and "My Sex" gets better with each listen. Can't wait to hear a studio version. I assume all the ones they've done live will make the final tracklisting but who knows?!
A couple of singles before/during the UK arena tour, new album in the summer then "Different Class" 30th anniversary remaster/reissue at the end of October.
As far as I know, there aren't any completely unheard songs in the vaults from the "Different Class" period but there are demo versions of most songs from the album. Therefore, a 3CD reissue is certainly possible.
As the lyrics were only written in the studio as the final songs were being recorded, I doubt there are many DC demos that aren't just instrumentals
Good shout, nice pacing. I listened to most of the new ones at the weekend from the Youtube uploads of the performances in the US and "My Sex" gets better with each listen. Can't wait to hear a studio version. I assume all the ones they've done live will make the final tracklisting but who knows?!
The live versions are compiled and re-upped here: https://archive.org/details/pulp-studio25
Was it you who put that little comp together? Thanks very much, that's what I was listening to. Not overdoing it in case I'm pissed off by the album versions being inferior (I suffered this fate with some of Further Complications and Jarv Is...).
Re DC demos, they did all have lyrics as the sessions happened in a frantic week between Common People changing their lives and the album sessions beginning and just before Glastonbury. When the Pulp story is dramatised, June '95 will have its own ep.
A couple of singles before/during the UK arena tour, new album in the summer then "Different Class" 30th anniversary remaster/reissue at the end of October.
As far as I know, there aren't any completely unheard songs in the vaults from the "Different Class" period but there are demo versions of most songs from the album. Therefore, a 3CD reissue is certainly possible.
That'd be Nice. !
I wouldnt mind a "rework" of DC if they dont have anything else. Maybe with a new mix, new bits that were left out, stuff like that. What's been done for the Beatles the last couple of years was amazing.